Skip to Content

DP macros are not being calculated correctly using process chain

Hello all!!

I have this DP planning book with two grids, which the second grid has some macros. I have to put this macros execution in a Process Chain, but it´s very strange because, when I execute the macro directly in the interactive planning the result is correct, but when I execute it using the process chain, the result is wrong.

The selection profile and the aggregation level in the Process Chain is the same that is being used in the selection profile.

I´ve already created the activities and also the planning job to be used in the process chain.

Could you help me?

Best regards

Angela

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

3 Answers

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Dec 12, 2008 at 06:22 PM

    I would suggest to create a test selection Id with a few products (say 5) and create a new job with this selection profile and include that job in the process chain and execute it. Please monitor the job log while porcessing... for this right click on the process in the process chain and select 'Display all jobs'..it will take you to the SM37 screen..there click the job log and spool file and observe what exactly the job is doing i.e whether its executing correctly or its skipping that process or something else is doing...

    The second thing you can try out is by creating a separate dataview for the second grid in the test sytem and replicate the scenario and check if it has any impact, my guess is if process chain is not supporting the macros in the second grid

    Edited by: sai balakavi on Dec 12, 2008 8:14 PM

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Dec 15, 2008 at 09:34 AM

    Hi Angela,

    Please see SAP notes 412429, 546079.

    Regards,

    Alexander

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Dec 16, 2008 at 01:28 AM

    Hello

    Thanks for the help. I was having a problem with the aggregation and also with the second grid, but this is innevitable.

    Best Regards

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded