Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

27 biweekly payperiods and impact on benefits

We will have 27 pay periods in 2009. This is causing the deductions to be reduced because the system is dividing the yearly deductions by 27 and not 26. We have tried using the payment models (benefit integration in payroll), but when we configure this it make the employees benefit plan deductions monthly and the deduction is even farther off.

Does anyone have any ideas? We would appreciate any help.

Thanks in advance.


Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Related questions

2 Answers

  • Posted on Oct 20, 2008 at 10:04 PM

    This is pat of the payment/deduction model in the configuration. You can mark one of the pay periods to be skipped for deduction.


    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Posted on Oct 21, 2008 at 01:18 AM


    You have to setup the payment model for a bi-weekly frequency (not monthly).

    1. Generate a payment model for 2009 ONLY using the following settings:

    Use Date Modifier = 01 (if your payroll consultant agrees)

    Period Parameter = 04 (bi-weekly)

    Cumulation type = V (bi-weekly)

    2. Define your payment model (i.e. Z26P) and attach the 01, 04 and V settings in the fields where requested.

    3. Set Pay Periods (select only the 26 that you desire)

    4. Define Employee Groups (using Feature MODDE) is not necessary, unless only some employees will follow this calendar, while others do not.

    5. Set Default Values is not necessary unless you used Feature MODDE and the deduction is stored on IT14. In this case, the return value in the feature is your Variable Key in this table, tied to the Wage Type used on IT14, and Payment Model created.


    6. From Benefits Integration, go to Assign deduction model. Enter plan code, Variable key as the payroll area (create multiple lines if plan is processed in more than one payroll area), and the Payment Model created. From this table, you also have a chance to use Feature MODDE, again it's not necessary as per #4 above.

    Be sure to test this Payroll for every period in 2009 to confirm 26 pays (instead of 27) and run payroll for 2010 to ensure there are no error messages now that the deduction model has expired.

    If so, you can generate the deduction model for all years, selecting the 26 pays each year, so that if you have this situation again, it's already covered, and when it's a normal year, the 26 pays are used anyway. This is probably best method.

    Or if the client does not want the model generated for all following years, someone will have to remove the configuration for Plan assignment before the 1st payroll of the new year is run. Again, I would test this theory. I haven't had a client that only needed to utilize the models for 1 year.

    Good Luck.

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.