on 10-16-2008 6:14 PM
Has anyone seen this error while trying to start their ECC 6.0 system: Symbol resolution failed for i5/OS PASE module sapstart
We applied the latest patch to R3INLPGM, LIB_DBSL, O4TRC, and STARTSAP. Now our instance won't start.
The joblog reads:
CPDB9D0 Diagnostic 30 10/16/08 11:57:13.366320 QP2USER2 QSYS *STMT R3INLPGM R3ERD400 *STMT
From module . . . . . . . . : QP2EXERR
From procedure . . . . . . : sendmsg__FPCcN21e
Statement . . . . . . . . . : 34
To module . . . . . . . . . : AS4EXECI2
To procedure . . . . . . . : RunPase
Statement . . . . . . . . . : 184
Message . . . . : Symbol resolution failed for i5/OS PASE module sapstart.
Cause . . . . . : Symbol resolution failed attempting to load i5/OS PASE
program sapstart. Recovery . . . : See other messages in the job log.
Correct the errors and then try the request again.
CPDB9D3 Diagnostic 30 10/16/08 11:57:13.366352 QP2USER2 QSYS *STMT R3INLPGM R3ERD400 *STMT
From module . . . . . . . . : QP2EXERR
From procedure . . . . . . : sendmsg__FPCcN21e
Statement . . . . . . . . . : 34
To module . . . . . . . . . : AS4EXECI2
To procedure . . . . . . . : RunPase
Statement . . . . . . . . . : 184
Message . . . . : Symbol o4_getpwuid (number 232) not exported from
dependent i5/OS PASE module /usr/sap/ERD/SYS/exe/run/os4apilib.so.
Cause . . . . . : The symbol is not exported from dependent i5/OS PASE
module /usr/sap/ERD/SYS/exe/run/os4apilib.so. The error occurred attempting
Job description . . . . . . : R3_00 Library . . . . . : R3ERD400
MSGID TYPE SEV DATE TIME FROM PGM LIBRARY INST TO PGM LIBRARY INST
to load i5/OS PASE module sapstart. Recovery . . . : Correct the error
and then try the request again. Technical description . . . . . . . . :
Examine file headers with the i5/OS PASE 'dump -Tv' command. i5/OS PASE
commands can be entered on the command line displayed by calling program
QP2TERM in an interactive job.
I am not familar with running 'dump -Tv' .
Thanks!
Diana
Hello,
we had this at one point. It indicates that you have 'inconsistencies' in the kernel. You should probably at least get the DW patch for the same level. If there is a complete kernel out right now, I would go with that.
Please check the Forumalso, there have been several threads regarding the kernel in the last couple of weeks.
Regards,
Ingrid
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
86 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.