Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

ICR Process 003 FBICR3

Dear all,

We have set an additional rule for manual assignment to be used in transaction FBICR3. The rule compares the field DOCNR from the Organizational Unit with field REFNR (XBLNR) from the Partner. When OrgUnit DOCNR equals Partner REFNR the documents should be suggested for assignment. However the rule does not work. Does the rule only works for the same fields. Am i missing something?

Thanks and regards,

Renato Morais

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

2 Answers

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Oct 17, 2008 at 12:39 PM

    Dear all,

    we also have set an additional rule for manual assignment to be used in transaction FBICR3.

    Our rule compare the fields ZUONR and XBLNR as follows:

    10 ZUONR Zuordnung Equals XBLNR Referenz

    20 XBLNR Referenz Equals ZUONR Zuordnung

    This rule is set up as a manual rule.

    The table FBICR003A and FBICR003T contain these fields, so that we expect the rule to assign documents successfully. But there is not match of assigned documents.

    Our testcase has the same currency, the same amount and the correct document numbers in the mentioned fields.

    Thanks for your support,

    Best regards,

    Karin Albers

    Edited by: Karin Albers on Oct 17, 2008 2:39 PM

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Hello Karin,

      Please note that when you enter several conditions in the definition of a rule all of the conditions have to be fulfilled. In the rule you specified ZUONR in the company document must be the same as XBLNR in the partner document and XLBNR in the company document must be the same as ZUONR in the partner document at the same time. It documents would have to look like this:

      ---------------------------------
      | RCOMP | DOCNR | ZUONR | XBLNR |
      ---------------------------------
      | C1000 | 1234  | 11223 | 33221 |
      | C2000 | 4321  | 33221 | 11223 |
      ---------------------------------
      

      You should delete the second entry. The assignment should work if you only set up the rule as XBLNR = ZUONR. The data is analyzed from the company's point of view as well as the partner's point of view.

      I am a little surprised that you are saying that XLBNR and ZUONR are available in FBICRC003T. This is really not necessary. You should only define additional fields to be contained in the totals table if you want to use them for defining your object groups. Assignment is performed on the line item level, therefore the fields only have to be contained in FBICRC003A. Otherwise you will create a large number of unnecessary totals records which will slow down the overall processing.

      Best regards,

      Ralph

  • Oct 20, 2008 at 01:38 PM

    Hello Renato,

    You should check whether maybe one of the fields contains leading zeros. These may not be shown in the transaction due to the alpha conversion assigned to the respective data elements, but this could cause them not being matched. If you look at the data records in SE16N and double click on one of the lines it will show you the content of the fields without alpha conversion. If the document number contains leading zeros but the reference number does not this would be the reason for the assignment result. You can set up the program to delete leading zeros in the document number during data transfer in transaction FBIC010. Double click on the process where you want to set this up and make sure that you set the checkbox Convert Document Number (Delete Leading Zeros).

    Hope this helps,

    Ralph

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded