SAP for Utilities Discussions
Connect with fellow SAP users to share best practices, troubleshoot challenges, and collaborate on building a sustainable energy future. Join the discussion.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Business partner

former_member487858
Active Participant
0 Kudos

Hi experts,

I am trying to do the archiving of FI_FICA object.

For that I have assigned the archive flag as true for a particular business partner using the TAC ---BUPA_PRE_DA. But I am getting the error message as " Move In doc exists for the business partner " and " No Partners found for stated selections".

How do I rectify this. How do select the business partner for archiving.

Can any one give some suggestions please.

Thanks.

Shree.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

former_member801654
Discoverer
0 Kudos

Hi, Shree.

The little bit I know about archiving of FI_FICA object, suggested that any active object linked to the BP, might cause this error.

Therefore if any open documents in the DFKKOP table exist linked to the Contract Account in table FKKVKP or if an active (moved-in) contract exist (table EVER) linked to the Contract Account, then the archiving of the FI_FICA object will fail.

Also note that both the Contract (Table EVER field LOEVM) and the Contract Account (Table FKKVKP field LOEVM) has archiving indicators as well that might need to be set.

There are also a number of Functional Modules that need to be activated or customised, depending on your requirements. Have a look at transaction FQEVENTS and search on Archiving.

In your test scenario, I suggest that you perform a move-out first and then re-test the achiving of the object.

I trust this might be of some help.

Regards

Jan

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2

former_member801654
Discoverer
0 Kudos

Hi, Shree.

The little bit I know about archiving of FI_FICA object, suggested that any active object linked to the BP, might cause this error.

Therefore if any open documents in the DFKKOP table exist linked to the Contract Account in table FKKVKP or if an active (moved-in) contract exist (table EVER) linked to the Contract Account, then the archiving of the FI_FICA object will fail.

Also note that both the Contract (Table EVER field LOEVM) and the Contract Account (Table FKKVKP field LOEVM) has archiving indicators as well that might need to be set.

There are also a number of Functional Modules that need to be activated or customised, depending on your requirements. Have a look at transaction FQEVENTS and search on Archiving.

In your test scenario, I suggest that you perform a move-out first and then re-test the achiving of the object.

I trust this might be of some help.

Regards

Jan

0 Kudos

Is there any standard transaction to set field LOEVM as marked on both tables?

Thanks in advance