Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

Alternative payee issue in check printing

Hi All,

We have a requirement to automatically print a single check for payee and alternative payee together and net the amount of all invoices. If we have a vendor A and Vendor B (whose alternative payee is Vendor A), Business requirement is to get single check for Vendor A consolidating the remittance information of both vendors (Vendor A and Vendor B).

We also want this to be reflected properly in check register and check number assigned to both the payment documents.

In the subroutine scheckinfo_speichern in Program RFFOUS_C, there is a logic to insert a new record in PAYR table against a check number.. Our requirement is to have 2 PAYR-LIFNR entries against the same Check Number(PAYR-CHECT).

Currently only the payment document number related to the alternative payee are displayed and not the other document.

Ideally, another line with same check number, other payment document number and alternative payee should be displayed. Check Number (PAYR-CHECT) is a primary field in the PAYR table ,it does not get updated with this detail.

Is there any other alternative for the same. Any pointers would be extremely helpful.

Thanks in Advance.

Regards,

Swati Wagh

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

2 Answers

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Oct 03, 2008 at 07:32 AM

    I am afraid this may not be possible in sap standard.

    how can you issue check to two vendors at time with same check number in real time scenario

    only thing you can do is copy the check form and modify that as per your requirement

    regards

    sateesh

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Oct 03, 2008 at 11:17 AM

    Hi,

    Thanks For your reply but we are issuing only one Check with the Consolidated details (Remittence and 2 payment docuemnt number) for both the vendors.

    But in Check register data for one payment document and one vendor is been updated.

    thats why we are lookin for any alternative way to do it.

    Regards,

    Swati

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded