on 08-27-2008 6:35 AM
Hi All,
I have done the integration of R3 back end with SRM system (SRM 5.0) Relaese level 12.
Classic scenario is working fine.
In the direct Material Procurement I get an error message that "the material is not active in plant XXXX or flagged for deletion".I have the Plant replicated into the SRM and the material in the Commpr01 Tx.There are no deletions scheduled for this material in the Back end or the SRM system.
Any clues?
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan
Hello Naga, you can try to create view MRP3 and fill field Availability check.
field MTVFP in table MARC
Thanks
Rosa
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Nagarajan,
Check in ERP if the Accounting view is maintained for the Product fo that plant.
Regards,
Hitendra
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Naga
Plz try to procure via describe requirement . you may not find difficulties and make ensure that you have problem with material master only.
Finally check you validit date from and to for that material in comm_product table. if it is valid you can do shopping or else you can not.
regards
Muthu
Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Aug 28, 2008 7:10 AM
Hi Muthu,
Thanks to all for all the pointers
These are the entries in the Comm_product Table
CLIENT 300
PRODUCT GUID DD540BC8B047CBF1B0D4001D0910D3CA
PRODUCT ID 142
PRODUCT TYPE 01
CONFIG
XNOSEARCH
OBJECT FAMILY
BATCH DEDICATED
COMPETITOR PROD
VALID FROM 17.07.2008 13:06:07
VALID TO 31.12.9999 23:59:59
UPNAME RFCUSER
HISTEX
LOGSYS EC6CLNT811
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan
Hi Naga/ Ravi
I have recreated your problem and found that there was a plant missing in your org structure and verify the plant and company code relations missing in your org strucure and verify the same in ec01 and company code in sc.
I have sent a document to you . Please let me know still if you have a problem.
Regards
Muthu
Hi Nagarajan,
We had the same problem earlier. Now it has been resolved. Please define the SRM System also as local system in Define Backend Systems configuration note.
Specify the Logical System of SRM, do not specify the RFC, select the back end system and select the check box Local and specify Real Time Back end Validations in FI Validations drop down. This must solve your problem.
Can you please check our query in the below link and respond
Thanks
Ravi
Hi,
If the material is active in respective org in backend and still if you are getting the explained error, then the problem could be with the logical systems in most cases.
Please make sure that logical systems have been maintained correctly. Because in most cases of client copy or system copy the materials might be pointing to old systems. Then please cross verify the backend system details and the RFC destination.
Regards
Kathirvel
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Muthu/ Kathirvel,
1)Please make sure that logical systems have been maintained correctly. Because in most cases of client copy or system copy the materials might be pointing to old systems. Then please cross verify the backend system details and the RFC destination
Logical system names are correct
2)Material is active in Back end and in the Ext attribute Plant, Slocation and the Prod Category is maintained.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan
Hi
Hope that you might checked mm06 .
regards
Muthu
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Naga
Check that material is under your plant in MM03 (extended attribute location). That plant and material combination in material master should be in ebp too.Check Dinesh reply .. your plant must be defined in ext attribute.
regards
Muthu
Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Aug 27, 2008 8:44 AM
Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Aug 27, 2008 8:44 AM
in ECC does the material master in question is available in the plant which is maintained in the ex attribute of user?
if no you need to extend the same in ECC MM01
BR
Dinesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.