cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Context error while mapping

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Experts,

I am using remove context node function to map my target node.The problem is the required node in the target is in higher context than the source node. i have mapped the fields below these nodes normally.

while mapping the nodes i am using remove context function.but when testing the target node is existing only once in payload.

Please help me out.

Thanks,

Srikanth

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

HI,

You need to use the combination of Remove context and splitByValue based on the target structure.

May I kindly request you to share the Source and Target structure so I could try to give the precise suggestion on this.

Thanks

swarup

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Swarup,

I will mail the screen shot to your gmail id please review it and find the solution.

Its very very urjent please do it ASAP.

Thanks,

Srikanth

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

You have to use 'UseOneAsMany' function with appropriate parameters. If possible paste target and source structure for clear understanding

Regards,

Shri

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Srikanth,

Communication via mail is against the SDN Forum Rules.

I have uploaded the photo--(I had removed the other part of the image as its confidential ...so don't worry)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/23638845@N04/2782914807/

This will help other XI experts to open their views also. So Plz don't mind...

Please find here with you the my suggestion about it.

Look the way you had mapped the gate message and westim message based on existance of gate message, is seems to be correct.

As you have said there will be always only one either get or westim message available. So no need to do any context changes with remove context.

Make sure to add this kind of check condition for all the internal fields also.

Let me know if this would solve your problem.

thanks

Swarup

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi swarup,

Thanks,

its working now.

Former Member
0 Kudos

HI,

i am happy as your problem is solved. So now please close the thread.

Thanks

Swarup

Answers (0)