08-13-2008 8:44 AM
Dear all
We are using ECC5(IS-RETAIL){FI,SD,MM)and we have development
Quality,Production server in our land scape.We have to manufacturing
division's one under the same legal entity and other seperate legal
entity ,we want to configre the busseness process of our manufacturing
divisions into the same landscape in which we are using a ECC 5.0
(IS_Retil)
Please confirm posibility of the above scenaroi.
thanks
with best regards
jainendra
08-13-2008 9:30 AM
Since this is the coffee corner, I am going to now sit and wait for the sarcastic answers you are going to get for posting the question here
T00th
08-13-2008 9:30 AM
Since this is the coffee corner, I am going to now sit and wait for the sarcastic answers you are going to get for posting the question here
T00th
08-13-2008 9:50 AM
>
> Since this is the coffee corner, I am going to now sit and wait for the sarcastic answers you are going to get for posting the question here
>
> T00th
If it wasnt for CC i would have been too tempted to make this post:
Profile Name: Venkat Ramesh
Signed off: jainendra
Now you made me do it nevertheless.
pk
08-13-2008 9:52 AM
> I am going to now sit and wait for the sarcastic answers you are going to get for posting the question here
What? Too lazy to post one yourself?
08-13-2008 9:56 AM
>
> > I am going to now sit and wait for the sarcastic answers you are going to get for posting the question here
>
> What? Too lazy to post one yourself?
LOL
And let the games... err.. posts begin..... (In True Olympic spirit)
pk
08-13-2008 11:22 AM
Hi,
as I have some time, but didn't really get the question I tried to translate it to german. The result was:
Lieb alle Wir verwenden ECC5 (IS-RETAIL) {FI, Sd, Millimeter) und wir haben Entwicklung Qualität, Produktionsbediener in unserem Land scape. Wir müssen Herstellung division' s eins unter der gleichen juristischen Person und anderer unterschiedlicher juristischer Person, wünschen wir zum configre den busseness Prozess unserer Fertigungsbereiche in die gleiche Landschaft, in der wir verwenden einen ECC 5.0 (IS_Retil) Bestätigen Sie bitte posibility des oben genannten scenaroi. danke mit bestem Respekt jainendra
As I couln't get the message now, because it came out real nonsense, I translated back to english and the result was:
Dear all we use ECC5 (IS-RETAIL) {FI, Sd, millimeter) and we have development quality, production operator in our country scape. We must production division' , we wish s one under the same legal entity and other different legal entity to the configre busseness process of our production areas into the same landscape, in which we use a ECC 5,0 (IS_Retil) confirming you please posibility specified the above scenaroi. thanks with best respect jainendra
Even more nonsense. So I gave up at this stage.
Siggi
08-13-2008 12:31 PM
After sending it through traditional Chinese it finally makes sense:
>Dear possesses us to use ECC5 (IS-RETAIL) {FI, Sd, the millimeter), and we have the development quality, our national scape production operator. We must produce division' We wish s one under the identical legal entity, and for our production region's configre busseness process's other other legal entities to the identical scenery, we use ECC 5,0 (IS_Retil) please to confirm that your posibility has assigned above scenaroi. With best respect jainendra thanks
08-13-2008 1:13 PM
This sounded Greek to me so I translated to Greek and then back to English.
Dear all We use ECC5 ([eimai]-[LIANIKO]) {FI, SD, [KK]) and have the growth Quality, central computer of production in our ground scape. Should manufacture division'? s under the same legal person and other separate legal person, we want in the configre process of busseness our constructional departments in the same landscape in which we use ECC 5.0 (IS_Retil) I request you confirm posibility above scenaroi.
08-13-2008 1:33 PM
note how the typos (configre, busseness, scenaroi, posibility) withstand any forceful translation attempt...
08-13-2008 2:00 PM
>
> note how the typos (configre, busseness, scenaroi, posibility) withstand any forceful translation attempt...
That reminds me of a lovely goofup where advisors hired by one of my former employers copied a report made for another customer and did a search and replace on the customer name hoping to charge twice for work done once.
Unfortunately the other customers' name was mistyped twice in the original.....
08-13-2008 2:02 PM
I've moved this to the Industry forum, but want to "gently" remind you to read the Rules of Engagement. The fact that you already have quite a number of posts leads me to believe you are not entirely a newbie here. Caring for things like proper title of post, searching for appropriate forums and attention to format and spelling in the question are all things, when ignored, that open you for critique and sometimes impatience of others and even for others to poke fun at, which was your fate in the coffee corner. Take more care please and you will find your interactions here more productive.
Many of the same people who respond sarcastically in the coffee corner are the same passionate, helpful participants on the "other side". Try to stay on that side, please.
08-13-2008 2:06 PM
> Many of the same people who respond sarcastically in the coffee corner are the same passionate, helpful participants on the "other side".
With that in mind, it does make me feel slightly unconfortable seeing my "Coffee Corner posts" moved to a serious forum. I hope everyone will see the top part of this thread in it's proper perspective.
08-13-2008 2:52 PM
Indeed a funny situation...
serious answers below this line please (and the one above of course)
-
08-13-2008 2:51 PM
Dear Venkat,
please repost your initial question again.
As I do understand you, you ask for the possibility to activate a IS Retail system and having in parallel a manufacturing system on the same box?
I guess from license perspective this is not possible.
Activating Retail functionality will set some impacting processes in system.
I do not recommend this to do.
regards
B