on 08-12-2008 12:01 PM
Hello Friends,
In our sales process & the subsequent invoice processing, we are using access sequence comprising the customer & material tax classification for maintaining condition records.
As we all are aware that the classification indicators (eg. 1) flow from the customer & material masters in order processing.
In IMG, we have "Define Tax Determination Rules", where we define a tax category (eg JTX1, JTX2, JTX3, JTX4) for country india. Further we define "Define Tax Relevancy Of Master Records" wherein we assign tax class (eg. 0,1,2) to the tax categories.
Finally we maintain the condition record. I use condition type JIVP for maintaining VAT percentage & also use the tax classification flowwing from the master.
Now my query is, my condition type for VAT is JIVP, whereas in both customer as well as material master I have tax categoy as JTX1.
Do I require to maintain JIVP as tax category in masters or whatever i have done above is correct.
Regards,
Dhananjay
Hi,
The steps followed for tax relevancy is correct for customer and material master.
So no need to maintin JIVP as tax category in material and customer master records.
regards,
vimal
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.