Hi Team,
I have activate BTE 1650 also after that FBL3N report is running very slow.
please suggest me how can I improve performance of this report
Hi,
a) Was performance reasonable without BTE?
b) Are you accessing archived records in your selection when you run FBL3N?
c) What is your SAP release?
If the answer to a) is positive, then post screenshot of what you have put in BTE. Verify that the algorithm is not running on non-indexed fields.
Regards,
Eli
Please suggest me how to check "algorithm is not running on non-indexed fields"
What is your code in BTE? If you just, judging by the fields you added in the structure, bringing the texts to the report, it shouldn't impact much the performance unless the code is made in peculiar way.
FUNCTION Z_INTERFACE_00001650.
*"----------------------------------------------------------------------
*"*"Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*" VALUE(I_POSTAB) LIKE RFPOS STRUCTURE RFPOS
*" EXPORTING
*" VALUE(E_POSTAB) LIKE RFPOS STRUCTURE RFPOS
*"----------------------------------------------------------------------
*-------------- Initialize Output by using the following line ----------
E_POSTAB = I_POSTAB.
TABLES : BSEG, LFA1,KNA1.
DATA: W_NAME1 TYPE LFA1-NAME1,
W_NAMEC TYPE KNA1-NAME1,
W_LIFNR TYPE LFA1-LIFNR,
W_KUNNR TYPE BSEG-KUNNR,
W_HKONT TYPE BSEG-HKONT,
W_TXT TYPE SKAT-TXT20,
W_EBELN TYPE EKKO-EBELN.
IF E_POSTAB-BLART EQ 'WE'.
* “For MIGO documents
SELECT SINGLE EBELN INTO W_EBELN FROM BSEG WHERE BELNR = E_POSTAB-BELNR
AND BUKRS = E_POSTAB-BUKRS
AND GJAHR = E_POSTAB-GJAHR
AND HKONT = E_POSTAB-HKONT.
*** for GL accunt and description for expenses
SELECT SINGLE HKONT FROM BSEG INTO E_POSTAB-ZHKONT WHERE BELNR = E_POSTAB-BELNR AND BSCHL in ('81','91')
AND KOART ='S'.
SELECT SINGLE TXT20 FROM SKAT INTO E_POSTAB-ZTXT20 WHERE SAKNR = E_POSTAB-ZHKONT.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
SELECT SINGLE LFA1~NAME1
LFA1~LIFNR
INTO (W_NAME1, W_LIFNR)
FROM EKKO INNER JOIN LFA1 ON EKKO~LIFNR =
LFA1~LIFNR WHERE EKKO~EBELN = W_EBELN.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
E_POSTAB-ZNAME = W_NAME1.
E_POSTAB-ZLIFNR = W_LIFNR.
CLEAR:W_NAME1,W_LIFNR.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ELSE.
* “For other than MIGO doc
*i.e. Vendor Invoice
SELECT SINGLE LIFNR
FROM BSEG
INTO (E_POSTAB-ZLIFNR)
WHERE BUKRS = I_POSTAB-BUKRS
AND GJAHR = I_POSTAB-GJAHR
AND BELNR = I_POSTAB-BELNR
AND BSCHL IN ('31','21')
AND KOART = 'K'.
*** Customer code
SELECT SINGLE KUNNR
FROM BSEG
INTO (E_POSTAB-ZKUNNR)
WHERE BUKRS = I_POSTAB-BUKRS
AND GJAHR = I_POSTAB-GJAHR
AND BELNR = I_POSTAB-BELNR
AND BSCHL IN ('01','02','11','12','15')
AND KOART = 'D'.
** Fetching Customer name
SELECT SINGLE NAME1
FROM KNA1
INTO E_POSTAB-ZNAMEC
WHERE KUNNR = E_POSTAB-ZKUNNR.
* Fetching Vendor Name
SELECT SINGLE NAME1
FROM LFA1
INTO E_POSTAB-ZNAME
WHERE LIFNR = E_POSTAB-ZLIFNR.
ENDIF.
ENDFUNCTION.
Have a look at the following OSS notes
- 977792 - FBL3N: Performance improvement while reading archive records
- 904163 - FBL3N - performance problem after Support Package 10
- 2568807 - Performance improvement for FBL3N
You can experiment with enabling and disabling the BTE in FIBF to determine the perfomance impact.
Furthermore the new approach to do this is with a BADI (i'm not sure if the performance is affected) 1323512 - Line items: BADI FI_ITEMS_CH_DATA / 1504612 - Line item: Offsetting account information (BAdI FI_ITEMS_CH_DATA)
Last but not least: you'll need an ABAP or BASIS consultant to solve this
Of course, you would have performance problems: you run a selection on BSEG!
Hi Mr Eli Klovaski,
we required selection from bseg without we cannot get Purchase order no and vendor code so how can we improve performance of FBL3N report
Read some other table, which is indexed; i.e. BSIK/BSAK.
You cannot expect good performance while reading BSEG.
Hi Mr Eli Klovaski,
Thanks for reply
All the data is not available in BSIK and BSAK table i.e Purchase order No. This information is must required so that we used BSEG Table please suggest any other table can we use instead of BSIK,BSAK