cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

vendor ranking list..?ME6H

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi all

Can anybody explain me about the ME6H in vendor evaluation..?

In that , i m getting 6 columns with ranking list..

Cam anybody explain me about the 6 columns

Thanks

sap-mm

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

pankaj_singh9
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

These fields are

Qty. reliability 1

Qty. reliability 2

On-time delivery 1

On-time delivery 2

Shipping instruct. 1

Shipping instruct. 2

These can be defined in SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Statistics > Define Grid for Quantity Variances

And SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Statistics > Define Grid for Delivery Date Variance

Percentage quantity variance

Quantity variance in the Purchasing Information System.

Procedure

Maintain the intervals for the degrees of variance. You can determine a

maximum of five intervals.

Examples

Determine, for example, the following intervals:

o From -n% to -20%

From -19% to -10%

From -9% to 10%

From 11% to 20%

From 21% to n%

This means that a goods receipt with a 24% shortage falls into the first category. A goods receipt with an overdelivery of 13%, falls into the fourth category.

In the statistics, each goods receipt is updated with the corresponding interval.

Delivery date deviation in days

Schedule deviation for the Purchasing Information System.

Procedure

Maintain intervals for the degrees of deviation. You can determine a

maximum of five intervals.

Examples

Determine, for example, the following intervals:

o From -n to -20 days

From -19 to -10 days

From -9 to 10 days

From 11 to 20 days

From 21 to n days

This means that a goods receipt that is delivered 21 days too early, falls into the first category. A goods receipt that is delivered 12 days after the delivery date, falls into the fourth category.

In the statistics, each goods receipt is updated along with the corresponding interval.

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

ME6H--> Vedor Evaluation

Vendor can be evaluated with respect to Plant, Purchase organization,

material, Pur info category, Pur info record

Depending on different variants this vendor evaluation can be done

Vendor Evaluation

The vendor evaluation standard analysis enables you to evaluate the data from the vendor evaluation in Purchasing. The analysis is based on data that is updated to the information structure S013. This standard analysis allows you to find out whether a certain vendor delivers material on time and in the correct quantity required. The key figures that can be evaluated are the scores for the criteria: quantity reliability, on-time delivery performance, deviation from shipping notification (keeping the confirmation date), shipping instructions, quality audit (is currently not updated).

You can find information on the Vendor Evaluation component in the document MM - Materials Management, under the section on vendor evaluation.

The standard SAP System offers you a scoring range from 1 to 100 points, which is used to measure the performance of your vendors on the basis of the main criteria.

You can determine and compare the performance of your vendors by reference to their overall scores.

The main criteria available in the standard system are:

· Price

· Quality

· Delivery

· General service/support

These main criteria serve as a basis for evaluating vendors from whom you procure materials.

· Service

This main criterion serves as a basis for evaluating those vendors you employ as external service providers.

· Invoice

This main criterion serves as a basis for evaluating vendors from whom you procure materials or services.

You can also define other or further main criteria, as required.

You can assign different weights to the individual criteria. The vendoru2019s overall score is computed taking into account the weighted scores awarded for each of the main criteria.

The Vendor Evaluation System ensures that evaluation of vendors is objective, since all vendors are assessed according to uniform criteria and the scores are computed automatically.

In this way, subjective impressions and judgments can be largely eliminated.

To create a detailed evaluation, each main criterion can be divided into several subcriteria.

The standard system provides you with certain subcriteria which suffice as a basis for evaluation. You can also define your own additional subcriteria.

The scores for the subcriteria are calculated in different ways.

Scoring Methods

Scoring method

Description

Fully automatically

Scores are calculated by the system on the basis of existing data.

Semi-automatically

You enter individual scores for important materials, or for the quality and timeliness of a service performed, yourself. The system then calculates the higher-level score from these.

Manual maintenance

You enter a blanket score for a subcriterion per vendor.

You can decide yourself which of these methods to use.

Analyses

The results of vendor evaluation are displayed in the form of analyses. For example, you can generate ranking lists of the best vendors according to their overall scores or ranking lists for specific materials.

Changes to evaluations are recorded in logs, and you have the option of printing out evaluation sheets.

See also:

Structure linkMM Purchasing

Structure linkMM External Services Management

Leaving content frame

Thanks & Regards

Swathi