cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Schedule line does not exist in APO

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

When I ran the delta report, CCR, I saw a Purchase Requisition blocked with error:

Missing in APO

Schedule line does not exist in APO

Message no. /SAPAPO/CIF181

In our external procurement relationship (EPR), for material 'M', source Location 'S' and destination location 'D', I see a contract '100' with document item '80'. Only one doc no. in EPR.

Now when the purchase requisitions come through in R/3, we see in the product view in APO for the material the PR as 12345/00010

The PRs are getting created in R/3 and getting pushed to APO with item no.10 instead of 80.

Is the item number 10 common for all orders or should it be following the item number assigned in the contract in R/3 ( which is same as the Transportation lane in APO.

Thanks.

Edited by: Raj G on Jul 18, 2008 2:19 PM

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (3)

Answers (3)

Former Member
0 Kudos

This is a order that we manually push to R/3. Nothing wrong it seems.

srinivas_krishnamoorthy
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

there is definitely something wrong if you are seeing CCR discrepancies after CIFing the purch req from APO to R3. Usually once the PReq gets created in R3, all the properties of that PReq should ideally get reflected in the one on APO side. I would recommend you to check OSS notes on both APO and R3 side with the error string. There would definitely be some of them based on the patch level you are in. The other thing is to do some initial transfer just to make sure the integration model is well initialized just as a one time thing.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Srinivas,

Thanks for the reply. I searched OSS notes and found this one.

Note 1152934 - DELTAREPORT:confirmation-error 181 for after return delivery

But this is talking about deliveries and returned deliveries.

You think this note can still be implemented?

Former Member
0 Kudos

Any suggestions please?