on 02-07-2018 4:41 PM
Standard IBP is provisioned presenting a two tenant setting. One tenant for development/QA and one productive tenant. In many companies the on-premise landscape (ECC, APO) exists in a three tier setting, One DEV system, a QA system and a productive system.
Regarding the IBP set up I have a question what the best reasons are to consider a three tier setup for IBP.
Does anybody have good motivation to have a three tier setup?
hi ,
You can have 3 tenant landscape based on your existing landscape need. If you are completely transforming into DEV/PROD model you can with 2 tenant or if you want to match with existing on-premise model you can have 3. If you want do development and testing in parallel and connecting to you onpremise systems you can go with 3 .
Thanks,
Chandra
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
9 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.