Skip to Content

Parent member of TDH-dimension in page axis does not perform as desired

I have time depending hierarchies set up for the entity dimension. I have a EPM report where the time periods are listed in the columns and account in the rows. The entity is selected based on the context. I have 3 ranges of time periods, with each their own key date.

So I split the report in three, each of them now sharing the row and page axis and each with their periods in the columns and their own key date.

This does not work. The differences in the entity time dimension are not reflected over time.

When I now move the entity to the row axis besides the account dimension, it is still not working.

If I now expand on the entity member, showing the children (and the parent), the 3 reports show the correct data for all periods.

If I now bring the organization to the page axis, containing the children (as a string of members) of the originally selected parent it still works.

And (of course) now removing the children and getting back the original parent, the data is not correct again.

My question, is this expected behavior? Does TDH only make sense when the dimension is positioned in rows/columns? We are on SAP BPC NW 10.1

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

3 Answers

  • Feb 06 at 05:59 PM

    It's better to illustrate your question with screenshots - to be sure that I understand you correctly.

    For sure the axis with TDH dimension can't be shared!

    You can use 3 individual page axis with Excel formula relations...

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Feb 07 at 08:18 AM

    Hi Vadim,

    Here are the screenshots:case12.png case34.png

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Feb 19 at 09:56 AM

    Hi Vadim, Its now investigated by SAP.

    In your opinion, should it work (as being logical) or have you seen it work?

    kind regards

    Tim

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded