Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

Picking 2 pallets from same source bin but in difference WT and WO

Hello Team,

Normally when we pick 2 pallets from the same source bin, one warehouse task with 2 items is created and this is assigned to one warehouse order. but here in my case one warehouse task with 2 items is created and the assignment is to two warehouse orders. What's the reason behind this?

Both WO has the same WOCR used -HU03

When checking the WO logs i see the difference:

AA determination rule is missing for the failure case:

Failure case: 2 WO for 2 WT:

Warehouse order creation is processing: 2 WTs with directly assigned creation rule 0 WTs with search sequence for determining creation rules Warehouse order creation called up within a process Creation rule HU03 used for 2 WTs Creation rule HU03 is of the type "Pick Path" Item filter HU03 checked WT 27102276 passed the filter WT 27102940 passed the filter 2 WTs passed, 0 WTs did not pass item filter HU03 Inbound WT sorting rule PIPA used 2 WTs passed, 0 did not pass subtotal filter Limit value MX01 used for 2 warehouse tasks Warehouse task 27102940 passed limit value Maximum limit values were exceeded due 2 WT Limit values: current values for these 2 warehouse tasks Limits for items: minimum 0, maximum 1, current 2 Limits for number of HUs: maximum 999, current 0 Warehouse order should be executed using resource HEFTRUCK61 Resource management called with queue A.INT.PS2 Content provider 02 determined for warehouse order 9031475 Warehouse order 9031475 created on the basis of creation rule HU03 with 1 WTs Limit value MX01 used for 1 warehouse tasks Warehouse task 27102276 passed limit value Maximum limit value for 1 warehouse tasks was adhered to Limit values: current values for these 1 warehouse tasks Limits for items: minimum 0, maximum 1, current 1 Limits for number of HUs: maximum 999, current 0 Resource management called with queue A.INT.PS2 Content provider 02 determined for warehouse order 9031476 Warehouse order 9031476 created on the basis of creation rule HU03 with 1 WTs

successful case:1 WO per 2 WT:

Warehouse order creation is processing: 0 WTs with directly assigned creation rule 1 WTs with search sequence for determining creation rules Warehouse order creation called up within a process Activity area AS25 activity STCH used for determining creation rule The search sequence for activity area AS25 is used for 1 WTs Creation rule HU03 used for 1 WTs Creation rule HU03 is of the type "Pick Path" Item filter HU03 checked WT 27102276 passed the filter 1 WTs passed, 0 WTs did not pass item filter HU03 Inbound WT sorting rule PIPA used 1 WTs passed, 0 did not pass subtotal filter Limit value MX01 used for 1 warehouse tasks Warehouse task 27102276 passed limit value Maximum limit value for 1 warehouse tasks was adhered to Limit values: current values for these 1 warehouse tasks Limits for items: minimum 0, maximum 1, current 1 Limits for number of HUs: maximum 999, current 0 Resource management called with queue A.INT.PS2 Content provider 02 determined for warehouse order 9031278 Warehouse order 9031278 created on the basis of creation rule HU03 with 1 WTs

Could you tell me the reason behind this.

I don't know how to proceed further with this.

thank you in advance for your help.

Best Regards

Abinaya

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

6 Answers

  • Best Answer
    avatar image
    Former Member
    Feb 09 at 12:50 PM

    Hello Juergen

    PFA for WO creation logs.

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Feb 07 at 05:49 AM

    Hi Abinaya,

    "Failure case: 2 WO for 2 WT:" - It is due to limit (MX01) value in WOCR. 2 tasks

    "filter Limit value MX01 used for 2 warehouse tasks Warehouse task 27102940 passed limit value Maximum limit values were exceeded due 2 WT Limit values: current values for these 2 warehouse tasks Limits for items: minimum 0, maximum 1, current 2 Limits for number of HUs: maximum 999," -Fail Case

    "0 did not pass subtotal filter Limit value MX01 used for 1 warehouse tasks Warehouse task 27102276 passed limit value Maximum limit value for 1 warehouse tasks was adhered to Limit values: current values for these 1 warehouse tasks Limits for items: minimum 0, maximum 1, current 1 Limits for number of HUs: maximum 999," - Success Case

    Kind Regards,

    Ajit

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Feb 08 at 11:29 AM

    Here i see the difference as highlighted.

    And also the activity area determination is not there for the WO -9031476

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Feb 07 at 06:47 AM

    Hello Ajit,

    Thank you for you reply.

    But the question is why 2 WO got picked for same WT(27102276-line item 1 is assigned to 1 WO-9031278 and line item 2 (27102276) is assigned to other warehouse order -9031476 even though they have the same WOCR and same limit as 1 WO per WT.

    Thank you for your reply in advance.

    Best Regards

    Abinaya

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Feb 07 at 01:25 PM

    Hello,

    Please find the screenshot above

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Feb 08 at 07:46 AM

    Hi,

    "In my case one WT is assigned to two different warehouse orders" - I don't believe that. Or your system is seriously messed up.

    "WT may contain 1 or more line items." Hm, I actually also don't think that is true (sorry Ajit :-))

    "Failure case: 2 WO for 2 WT:" - what do you mean with "Failure case"? And what are these two logs supposed to be? OK, it seems you tried the thing twice and with different results (one hint: it helps if you post the log not as just one block of messages).

    First case:

    Warehouse order creation is processing:

    2 WTs with directly assigned creation rule --> So the WOCR is assigned to the warehouse process type

    0 WTs with search sequence for determining creation rules --> and there is no other WT

    Warehouse order creation called up within a process

    Creation rule HU03 used for 2 WTs

    Creation rule HU03 is of the type "Pick Path"

    Item filter HU03 checked --> Item filter starts

    WT 27102276 passed the filter WT 27102940 passed the filter 2 WTs passed, 0 WTs did not pass item filter --> and both WTs have passed

    HU03 Inbound WT sorting rule PIPA used

    2 WTs passed, 0 did not pass subtotal filter --> both WTs are still in

    Limit value MX01 used for 2 warehouse tasks --> the BC set limit filter MX01 says one WT per WO

    Warehouse task 27102940 passed limit value --> first WT is in

    Maximum limit values were exceeded due 2 WT --> but that is it.

    Limit values: current values for these 2 warehouse tasks --> the different limits

    Limits for items: minimum 0, maximum 1, current 2

    Limits for number of HUs: maximum 999, current 0

    Warehouse order should be executed using resource HEFTRUCK61 Resource management called with queue A.INT.PS2 Content provider 02 determined for warehouse order 9031475 --> mostly not interesting, but the first WO

    Warehouse order 9031475 created on the basis of creation rule HU03 with 1 WTs --> and first one done

    Limit value MX01 used for 1 warehouse tasks --> continue

    Warehouse task 27102276 passed limit value --> second WT is in

    Maximum limit value for 1 warehouse tasks was adhered to

    Limit values: current values for these 1 warehouse tasks

    Limits for items: minimum 0, maximum 1, current 1 Limits for number of HUs: maximum 999, current 0

    Resource management called with queue A.INT.PS2 Content provider 02 determined for warehouse order 9031476 --> second WO

    Warehouse order 9031476 created on the basis of creation rule HU03 with 1 WTs --> and that is it. Two WTs, two WOs. Is there any question?

    The second log:

    Warehouse order creation is processing:

    0 WTs with directly assigned creation rule --> this time there is no assigned WOCR

    1 WTs with search sequence for determining creation rules --> and there is just one WT

    Warehouse order creation called up within a process

    Activity area AS25 activity STCH used for determining creation rule

    The search sequence for activity area AS25 is used for 1 WTs

    Creation rule HU03 used for 1 WTs --> this is the first found WOCR

    Creation rule HU03 is of the type "Pick Path"

    Item filter HU03 checked

    WT 27102276 passed the filter --> the one WT passed the filter

    1 WTs passed, 0 WTs did not pass item filter --> no surprise here

    HU03 Inbound WT sorting rule PIPA used

    1 WTs passed, 0 did not pass subtotal filter --> again no real surprise

    Limit value MX01 used for 1 warehouse tasks

    Warehouse task 27102276 passed limit value --> not difficult

    Maximum limit value for 1 warehouse tasks was adhered to

    Limit values: current values for these 1 warehouse tasks

    Limits for items: minimum 0, maximum 1, current 1 Limits for number of HUs: maximum 999, current 0

    Resource management called with queue A.INT.PS2 Content provider 02 determined for warehouse order 9031278 --> one WO

    Warehouse order 9031278 created on the basis of creation rule HU03 with 1 WTs --> end of story.

    There is one WT and one WO in this log, so where is the problem???

    Brgds

    Juergen

    ---
    Want to learn EWM?
    Check for EWM courses @ https://training.sap.com/trainingpath/Applications-Warehouse+Management-SAP+EWM
    Get a SAP Learning Hub Subscription: https://training.sap.com/shop/learninghub

    And it is EWM. NOT eWM - Duh!
    And if your question includes the word "transfer order" - do NOT tag the question with Extended Warehouse Management!

    Schedule:
    CW6: Customer specific workshop
    CW7: EWM120 WDF
    CW8: Customer specific training
    CW9 + 10 EWM Bootcamp (specific partners only) WDF
    CW11: EWM110 HAM

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Thank you Juergen for your answer. I was never tested before (WOCR in WPT), tried yesterday and all WTs were directly assigned.

      My earlier assumption about "WTs with directly assigned creation rule" : It would only work with RF or WO Split processes .Example: when user pick the stock from bin , left the transaction incomplete (due to certain reason).Rest of WTs (any WTs left for picking from Bin) would be split (new WO with split) -Failure case above.

      Kind Regards,

      Ajit