VPRS: Error

[Former Member]

Dear SAP Guru;s

I am facing problem in the detremination VPRS condition type.

I have never seen this error.

When I see the order documents it is not showing VPRS Condition Type.

In the Billing screen Conditions it is showing 10 -15 VPRS with red indicator and Value Zero.

I can als see in the Analysis the Error is "Error in Auantity/Value Determination."

How Can I rectify the error.

regards,

Amlan Sarkar

[Former Member]

Hi Amlan,

I am facing the same error and have checked all the possible enteries. Can you please tell me how did you solve the problem.

Rgds,

Antima

[Former Member]

Thanks All for your Input.

There was Item cATEGORY GROUP FOR THE MATERIAL WRONGLY cONFIGURED.

regards,

Amlan

[Former Member]

Hello,

I am facing the same problem.

Could you tell me what was wrongly configured in the item category?

Best Regards

Jens

[claudia_neudeck]

Hello,

please check if you hava more than one VPRS in your pricing procedure.

In this case it is normally that the VPRS is zero.

For technical reasons, after determining the first cost, the system sets

the value from the goods issue document back to '0' so that the

subsequent costs are also given the value '0'.

When pricing is carried out again, the cost is taken from the material

valuation segment.

In the stardard system, only one condition category has been provided

for the costs (condition category 'G').

Set up your pricing procedure in such a way that only one cost occurs.

If you have only one condition with condition category please

check if the correct cost appears after pricing is carried out again.

I hope that the information are helpful.

Regards

Claudia

Please don't forget to give Reward Points if you are satisfied with the answer.

[former_member184555]

Hi

Please check the MMR whether the VPRS Cost is standard or Moving average. If standard whether the values are maintained in MMR. If Moving average, then the system gets the value from Info records and the problem could be from MM side.

This is only a clue....

Thanks,

Ravi