cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

QM Settings for Vendor Evaluation

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi All,

I am having a small issue with QM settings in Vendor Evaluation.

Actual Scenario - My client makes use of "Weighted Charateristics" instead of "Usage Decisions" and decides whether the material can be used or rejected etc at the time of Quality Inspection.

And, i believe that whatever the score or decision regarding the material was observed, it will be stored in a file with scores.

Now, the problem is Automatic Vendor Evaluation is simply giving a single score of 82 for whatever decision they make. Please try to address my following queries

1) Where the person responsible in QM needs to maintain the actual file with scores so that Vendor Evaluation can pick those scores for calculation?

2) Is there any configuration involved in either QM or Vendor Evaluation?

I came to know that all the configuration on the Vendor Evaluation side is OK

Thanks

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

Pl. check your material master data. If you have maintained the key Quality score based on actual decision, system should calculate the score based on the actual decision taken.

If this is not the key, then system should calculate score based on the key selected.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Prashant

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

In the MM side for QM criteria you have to make automatic only than rest will take by the QM module

see below

Complaints/Rejection Level

This subcriterion is used to evaluate whether the materials delivered by the vendor are regularly found to be faulty subsequent to incoming inspection (for example, on the shop-floor) leading to additional expense and loss of time (due to loss of production, reworking etc.).

The score (QM key quality figure) is calculated in QM Quality Management and the data passed on to MM Vendor Evaluation. This key quality figure is converted for use in the Vendor Evaluation scoring system.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks for the reply.

Our QM guy has recently resigned and this issue has been passed to me. Any further help would be appreciated

Thanks