on 05-02-2008 4:47 PM
Hi,
Can somebody explain to me the Locking Logic of "Activate Live Cache Lock in PA" in SAP APO v5.0? Will flagging this selection prevent the job from cancelling even though someone is using the PA?
Thanks
If the intention is to prevent online users from interfering with batch jobs, you can try to write a small development object using function modules of ENQUEUE_READ and TH_DELETE_USER, There are many other ways as well to prevent online users from editing data while batch job is ON however a development route will be the most effective in my experience.(eg. adding Parameter ID in batch for users with /SAPAPO/SDP94_D_MODE that will force the users to be in display mode)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi ,
In my system , we have aggregated locking in our PA.
As a result of this multiple single entries are not taken into consideration. So we are getting many errors "Locked by user"
For exp: If 1 user is in change mode for 1 sales org in selection profile , then another user who has 2 sales org in his selection profile , is getting an error "locked by user 1" and likewise entering into display mode.
Will using live cache locking solve the issue or is there any performance issue associated with it or do we have a danger to data ?
Look forward to your reply.
Regards.
Dear 'abinashp12' and Ann,
Can somebody explain to me the Locking Logic of "Activate Live Cache Lock in PA" in SAP APO v5.0?
Read SAP online help to understand the choices available to you.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/EN/77/d4103d2669752de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Will flagging this selection prevent the job from cancelling even though someone is using the PA?
No. There will always be locks of some kind when data is being changed, this is inherent to the design of any database, including the types of databases manged within Planning areas. 'Livecache lock' is a special kind of lock. Deselecting this checkbox will only result in a different type of lock instead.
Best regards,
DB49
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
8 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.