Skip to Content
0

Auto requision creation from Sales order without account assignemnt catagory.

Dec 25, 2017 at 05:14 AM

151

avatar image

Dear Experts,

Its known that from schedule line catagory we can control auto requisition creation.
My clients wants to create Stock transfer Requisition without any kind of account assignment category,clients do not want to provide any GL or cost center related to particular STO creation.
where account assignment category is mandatory and even though i have removed account modifier and consumption posting at the time of sales order creation system is always asking for GL assignmnt for GBB transaction key.
I do not want understand what is business logic behind mandatory account assignment for auto requisition creation and is there any way i can create STR without account assignment categroy.

Many Thanks,
Deep.

10 |10000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
* Please Login or Register to Answer, Follow or Comment.

1 Answer

Jyoti Prakash
Dec 28, 2017 at 08:35 AM
0

This could be b'coz the Field status group(Additional account assignments) for G/L account that is getting determined based on OBYC configuration is relevant for cost object.

Thanks, JP

Show 8 Share
10 |10000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded

Hello Experts,

Any suggestion please....my problem is If i remove account modifier from account assignment category system always asking for GL assignment for consummation posting (GBB transaction type) where at time of PGI GBB account getting debit and BSX account getting credit, but i need to debit credit in BSX transaction key only.

Thanking you,

Deep.

0

Yes sir,

If i map relevant GL for consumption posting at the time of creation STO system is aksing for default cost centre in STO .

problem is client not agree to book STO with any GL or cost centre and client will not provide any GL related to auto requisition.

Is there any way to pass account assignment catagory assignment in schedule line catagory.

Thanking you,

Deep.

0

What is Item Category and Account Assignment Category is getting determined for the transaction?

Moreover, why you need consumption posting for STO? Is that special stock?

0

Item category i have made Z , which help to determine schedule line category customize for auto requisition, in that schedule line category if i do not put relevant account modifier at the time of order creation asking for consumption posting, because system is searching for OBYC setting where GL mapping need with GBB transaction type, but i do not want to post in GBB transaction.

without-account-modifier.png

Many Thanks,

Deep.

0

Few observations.

  • There is no movement type involved. Why? Are these not valuated stock?
  • What sort of stock transfer is this?
  • If this is special stock, why no account modifier? W/o that how the system will do offset accounting entry?
  • For account assignment cat M, the sales order is mandatory. If you are unsure of account assignment in procurement, then you can use acc. assign. cat X or U to create PR. Once PR is adopted to create PO, then procurement guys can adopt account assignment accordingly.

Thanks, JP

0

Yes,this is valuated stock.This is plant to plant stock transfer, this material is not relevant to procurement.client wants from from sales order requisition will be create and from requisition STO need to create.there are nothing requirement of special stock but i can not use account modifier also because for that i need to assign GL.which client do not want.

Many Thanks,

Deep.

0

Check whether MM account assignment B is helpful to you.

But, if this is a valuated stock and movement is taking place between 2 plants.
Then how stock valuation will transfer from sender plant to receiving plant?

Whether your customer is interested in a Cost relevant GL?

Thanks, JP

0

Sure sir, i will do check with M. in STO condition type mark for internal cost, with 641 and 101 MT price and quantity will update in receiving plant.Customer do not want to make GL as default cost centre , becuase PL statement with GL only.

Many Thanks,

Deep.

0