0CA_TS_IS_1 and 0CA_TS_IS_2 extract structure modification

[jim_hanck]

CATS extractors both 0CA_TS_IS_1 and 0CA_TS_IS_2 use same structure CATS_IS_1.I appended a custom structure to this structure and added additional fields.

However, These additional fields are visible only in 0CA_TS_IS_1 extractor in RSA5 and none of these additional fields are visible in 0CA_TS_IS_2 extractor in RSA5.

Any specific reason it doesn't show up?

Thanks

[jim_hanck]

Additional info that might be of help. All the fields that are not visible are at the end of Standard extract structure CATS_IS_1. Last 9 of them are missing. However, all fields of appended Z structures are available in RSA6. It seemed like there is a structure width limitation of standard structure

[jim_hanck]

In RSA6, I'm not seeing the fields in 0CA_TS_IS_2 (that are in standard delivered dictionary structure CATS_IS_1) for unhiding, while I see all those fields in data source 0CA_TS_IS_1. Example: MEINH. This field is part of standard delivered extract structure and I see it in 0CA_TS_IS_1 and am able to unhide, while the same field is not showing up for data source 0CA_TS_IS_2. This is causing an issue with field OFMNW, which is visible but hidden. Since it has a reference to MEINH, I'm unable to unhide OFMNW. Similarly, few more fields of both standard structure as well as appended structure are not visible for 0CA_TS_IS_2 in RSA6.

[raymond_giuseppi]

Did you apply the same changes to both datasources in RSA6, both use the same FM to extract data CATS_BIW_GET_DATA2 only selection criteria on record status change.

• Selected / Hidden fields.
• Implementation of Enhancement RSAP0001 (SMOD) or BTE BW204010 (FIBF) or BAdI RSU5_SAPI_BADI (SE18).

Also did you check in table CATSDB for fields which could be initial as long as records are not approved?