Second option may create issue for auditing and/or it can mislead. In first option, you need to know whether your subcontracting vendor will charge for the reparation or not. My concern why do you need to do 541 movement type for child materials again as you are sending the semi-finish material to vendor. If it is just for a reparation process and does not affect any value (neither material's price nor any subcontracting changes), then you can go with subcontracting PO with free tick indicator (then 541 and 101/543) where you can use same material as component and main material as your sending and receiving material is same.
Hi,
If you are sending the FG back to vendor, I would suggest to create a direct return delivery in MIGO with 122 movement. This will remove the item from your stock and will show the component / child item stock as vendor stock. When the vendor repairs and send back, you can do a subsequent delivery and receive the FG in stock.
If its after invoicing, please check whether you can use the OMBZ functionality for 122 movement.
Regards,
Prasoon
Add comment