Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

Do 2 same auth objects with different values bleed together?

If I had a user who had Auth object F_BKPF_BUK with Activity 01 and Company Code 1200 and also Auth Object F_BKPF_BUK with Activity 03 and Company Code 1300, would the user have 01 and 03 for both Company Code 1200 and 1300 or would the user be restricted to 01 for 1200 and 03 for 1300?

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Assigned Tags

Related questions

3 Answers

  • Best Answer
    author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Dec 26, 2007 at 04:02 PM

    Hi tracy,

    In this case act 01 will be for CC 1200 only and act 03 will be for 1300 only. This is assuming you have given this via two different roles or at least in different instances for the same authorization object.

    Regards,

    Sanju.

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Dec 26, 2007 at 02:26 PM

    Hi Layman,

    user will have access to both the plants for 01 and 03 also

    because BUKRS field is maintaind at org level in PFCG not at object level

    please let me know if you have any queries on this

    thanks

    kishore

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Dec 26, 2007 at 06:07 PM

    It depends on the object and how the result of the authority-check is "built".

    For the result of a single authority-check Sanju is correct.

    It would not make sense to attempt to display something (retrieving the value from the record) which has not been created yet (checking the value in the entry screen).

    However the opposite can be true for authority-checks within arguments:

    - IF weak_check_failed "user is not authorized...

    - THEN perform strong_check "permit everything if passes...

    - ELSE return_to_... "Go back to list...

    However, in many cases this weaker : stronger check is against different objects.

    Other transactions will completely bypass the one object and only use a stronger one.

    F_BKPF_BUK should be okay for transactions FB01 and FB03, for example.

    Cheers,

    Julius

    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.