cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Transaction variant using SHD0

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi all ,

i have created a custom Tcode YME22 using SHD0 .it works perfectly fine the first time . after i click the 'back' button ,and enter another PO it behaves like ME22 . why is this happening ??

will the problem get solved if the user has access to only YME22 and not ME22 ???

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (4)

Answers (4)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks ... the issue was that there is hardcoded text in 'back' button

former_member223537
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Jimmy,

Well the point you have stated could be true. Please give it a try.

If the note is already implemented, then please check whether BACK event has a code with harcoded text LEAVE TO TRANSACTION ME22.

May be you will have to modify that.

Here are few other links with same issue:

http://www.jt77.com/securitysap/smart-forms-4976.html

Last option would be to rasie an OSS MESSAGE to SAP. This seems to be a bug in standard program.

Best regards,

Prashant

former_member223537
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Jimmy,

The note mentions the same issues which you have posted.

SAPKB46C03 is the package required for 4.6c.

Please check your system package. If it is less than the one mentioned above, then you need to implement the note.

Prima facie, it doesnt seems to be a development issue from your side & the note should be able to fix it.

Best regards,

Prashant

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Prashant ,

My system package is greater than which you have mentioned.

Could there be any other problem ?

could what i am thinking be true : the prob is occuring as i have access to both me22 and yme22 .the issue wont occur if i have access to only yme22 ?

thanks.

former_member223537
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Jimmy,

You need to implement SAP Note to resolve this issue.

Note 46625 - SHD0: Different execution of variant transactions

Best regards,

Prashant

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Prashant ,

are you sure this is the only solution ? we are in release 4.6c . wouldn't this note be already applied ?

thanks