cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Vendor problem in Garnishments

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

In my company HR is being implemented now. We were using SAP Fi for more than a year (but in a different client). Now when we are implementing HR, we are not doing 3rd party remittance, and so we did not maintain any FI vendors in our present client. But we do have garnishments. But, infotype 194 would not save as ACTIVE if there is no vendor maintained for this particular garnishment. How do we solve this problem. The system should be able to save infotypoe 194 without any vendor and be ACTIVE so that we see a deduction in payroll.

Please help.

Thanks.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

0 Kudos

Sam:

If vendors are maintained in a separate FI system, you should have a BADI set up (within ALE distribution model) that would let the system know to do vendor integrity checking on a host system instead of local system. Another option is to have vendors ALE from FI to payroll box (not as clean / convenience).

I assume this is for 'US' (IT0195) as for some counties (like South America), you don't have option to do vendor checking on different system.

Rgds.