Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

Vendor problem in Garnishments


In my company HR is being implemented now. We were using SAP Fi for more than a year (but in a different client). Now when we are implementing HR, we are not doing 3rd party remittance, and so we did not maintain any FI vendors in our present client. But we do have garnishments. But, infotype 194 would not save as ACTIVE if there is no vendor maintained for this particular garnishment. How do we solve this problem. The system should be able to save infotypoe 194 without any vendor and be ACTIVE so that we see a deduction in payroll.

Please help.


Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Related questions

1 Answer

  • Posted on Dec 04, 2007 at 08:04 PM


    If vendors are maintained in a separate FI system, you should have a BADI set up (within ALE distribution model) that would let the system know to do vendor integrity checking on a host system instead of local system. Another option is to have vendors ALE from FI to payroll box (not as clean / convenience).

    I assume this is for 'US' (IT0195) as for some counties (like South America), you don't have option to do vendor checking on different system.


    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.