Application Development Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Regarding Performance It is Urgent.

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi

I have one statement move-corresponding gt_bkpf to post_tab.

In gt_bkpf Internal Table 10 fields are there. Post_tab is another Internal Table.

In performance issue you need to use ASSIGN instead of move-corresponding.

How can i do it. Plz Reply.

Regards

Rami Reddy

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

former_member194613
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

> In performance issue you need to use ASSIGN instead of move-corresponding.

no, performance issues are something different, the move-corresponding is o.k., maybe some small overhead, but not a performance issue.

Siegfried

2 REPLIES 2

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi!

Field to field assignment means the following:

MOVE: gt_bkpf-bukrs TO post_tab-bukrs,

gt_bkpf-belnr TO post_tab-belnr,

gt_bkpf-gjahr TO post_tab-gjahr.

It's a very little bit faster that move-corresponding, but if you need a new field, you have to code that also, against move-corresponding, which handles it automatically (if their names are identical).

Regards

Tamá

former_member194613
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

> In performance issue you need to use ASSIGN instead of move-corresponding.

no, performance issues are something different, the move-corresponding is o.k., maybe some small overhead, but not a performance issue.

Siegfried