cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

QM -For same MIC valuation Insp Typt 3 lot rejected and Type 4 lot accepted

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi All ,

We have noticed that SAP seems to apply a different rounding algorithm for "valuating" data values entered into an 03 lot inspection versus a 04 lot inspection. That is, a test value was entered into an 03 lot inspection and was valuated by SAP as "Accepted". The same value when inputted into a 04 lot inspection was valuated by SAP as "Rejected".

For example, the value was 41.5 was valuated by SAP against the range of 32 - 41 for both 03 and 04 inspection lots. The 03 lot was "Accepted" but the 04 lot was "Rejected".

The same MIC number is used for both the 03 and 04 lot inspections. Within the MIC there were zero decimal places specified for the "valuated'"result.

Why was the value of 41.5 accpeted in the 03 lot and rejected in the 04 lot?

Even though same sampling procedure used..

Regards,

Neeraj

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

Inspection type 03 , you arte assigning the MIC for routing.

where as in 04 you are assigning MIC to inspection plan.

pl. check the version of MIC in oboth & sampling procedure if any assined in both.

Regards

YMREDDY

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Reddy,

I am using the same MIC in the routing and in inspection plan, with same sampling procedure. I have checked it .

Regards,

Neeraj