on 10-29-2007 1:40 PM
Hi experts!
Vendor in R/3 has no value in the 'Title' field of the address. When we replicate the same to SRM the 'Title' field is maintained with value '0003 Company'.
From OSS-Note 674481 - BBPGETVD/BBPUPDVD: Problems with form of address texts
I can read that a standard code for organizations is taken as default, if no address title is maintained. Does anyone of you know whether we can influence this behaviour? We would like to have the title the same way as in R/3. If it is empty it should also be empty in SRM.
Many thanks for your help.
Best regards,
Corinne
Hi experts!
I could solve the problem myself.
Table TSAD3 + TSAD3T needed an empty entry in all languages. Like this the vendor synchronization works now as expected. No Address Title in the backendsystem will give no address title in SRM which is what we wanted.
Regards,
Corinne
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Corinne,
can you maybe help me understand, whether your resolution will also work for the plants, that were replicated from R/3 to SRM.
Currently, if i replicate via bbp_locations_get_*, i also receive plant addresses in SRM, that have "company" in the title, although these plants don´t have a title in R/3.
Can you also please help understand, whether the two table mentiones by you have to be deleted on the SRM side? How did you execute the deletion?
Thank you very much.
Hi Atul
I will check your links.
We are using SRM 5.0.
Regards,
Corinne
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
<u>Which SRM and R/3 versions are you using ?</u>
<b>Please go through the following SAP OSS Notes, which will help -></b>
<u>Note 738777 Problems with form of address text during transfer from UME
Note 674481 BBPGETVD/BBPUPDVD: Problems with form of address texts</u>
Note 452017 Business partner maintenance: 'blank' form of address text
Note 503318 Update of e-mail addresses of the R/3 Backend vendors
Note 487420 Replicating the vendors as a job in EBP 2.0
Note 518531 EBP: Update with terms of payment fails
Note 456967 'Dun & Bradstreet' number, EBP 3.0
Note 361829 EBP (BBP2.0C): Business partner <-> vendor mapping
Note 357201 BBP 2.0B: Business partner <--> vendor mapping
Note 340227 Ext. business partner: address texts are not dynamic
Note 407800 Converting SU01 users to EBP users
Note 419423 Repairing incorrect EBP users
Note 330957 Creating user via BBPUSERMAINT causes error
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.