Ship-to party determination from sold-to in sales order

[former_member342867]

Dear community,

I am trying to deal with an incorrect partner functions determination in a sales order.

I have a Customer with different partners per sales area - As you see in the capture, en IT31-10-10 each partner function has different numbers while in IT31-10-20 all partner functions have the same number as the sold-to.

When I create a sales order with header IT31-10-10 the resulting SHIP-TO partner's functions at header level is incorrect - :

The log says that the "partner was defined manually" (!) but I can tell you that it wasn't so something's going wrong or I'm missing something in customizing which I doubt as I am using the standard procedures.

Would you have any idea of why is that happening?

Best Regards,

David

[VeselinaPeykova]

In your KNVP screenshot actually the ship-to parties are different than the sold-to, but this is not important for now.

If I understood you correctly, the order is created without reference and this was done after the master data was changed and it is indeed for IT31-10-10.

Could you also post screenshots of your VOPAN setup for sales order header? I am mainly interested in V_TPAER_VK, because it is possible to have additional custom logic for partner determination via exit.

[Former Member]

The ship-to are different for each sales area which is something that can actually happen and yes, you understood perfectly the explanation.

I add the screenshop of VOPAN - header -. The customizing you see is the TA (Standard order).

Many many Thanks for your help!

[VeselinaPeykova]

Your VOPAN setup looks absolutely normal to me and with standard configuration it should determine ship-to from the sold-to party (no x, y,z in origin and nothing specific in the source for SH) .

Is there any chance for another user exit interfering with partner determination? Normally one would expect this to be done done via some of the V09A* enhancements, but I would not eliminate the possibility of other points where this might occur.

This is probably a stupid thing to ask, but are you using common distribution channels or divisions? Such a thing could explain some illogical messages in the determination log and unexpected partner found.

[former_member342867]

Hi again Veselina,

I agree 100% with you on everything you said. No chance for user exits as the system is still 100% standard.

Not using yet common structures... I know what you mean. Eventually I will need to debug ...