cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

PACKNO inside ESKN is not listed in ESLH, but listed in LBLNI inside ESSR

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear All,

I check PACKNO field of table ESKN with SE11 and find out that ESKN-PACKNO has a check table which is ESLH, also field PACKNO

But !!!!

I cannot find any PACKNO values inside table ESKN with PACKNO inside table ESLH.

<b>It should that every PACKNO inside ESKN is registered inside ESLH table. Right ?</b>

But, I found out that ESKN-PACKNO data is filled with LBLNI from ESSR. From this site.

http://www.jt77.com/material/management-29211.html

<b>This is not consistent between what I see in SE11 and what I browse with SE16</b>

Unfortunately, that website is telling the truth. And how my R3 4.7 behaves.

Yes, I download all ESKN-PACKNO to text files (around 10.000) and check with SE16-LBLNI and all number is match !

I download all ESKN-PACKNO to text files (around 10.000) and check with SE16-ESLH <b>and none match !</b>

Any explain ? Is this sap error ? should ESKN-PACKNO is a foreign key with ESLH-PACKNO but it can have values which is not contained in ESLH-PACKNO ?

Instead, all ESKN-PACNO is ESSR-LBLNI ???????

BW Ahmad

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

rwarri1
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

This is not an error. The link between the tables is as follows

ESSR-PACKNO --> ESLH-PACKNO

ESSR-LBLINI --> ESKN-PACKNO

ESLH & ESLL are structured (pack #, parent pack #, highest pack #). Keep this in mind can link correctly if are developing a report.

Regards,

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

It's yes from MM point of view, which is ESSR-LBLINI --> ESKN-PACKNO

but BIG NO for abapers or somebody who understand the meaning of check table.

If you use t-code SE11 and type ESKN, you will see that ESKN-PACKNO check table is not ESSR-LBLNI.

As I cannot upload pictures to this site, this site might help you understand what I try to say:

http://bwas.sap.googlepages.com/essrandesknharmony

Regards,

BW Ahmad

Answers (0)