on 08-07-2007 12:24 PM
hello all..
i knw the RFC calls being synchronous..
i knw i can call RFC to RFC without using BPM..
i was wondering, if i go in for an RFC to RFC call with uing BPM, does it makes sense?
the scenario i was working on, with two sync call, was goin into time out stage and surely performance was affected...
wot do u say on the mentioned scenario?
regards,
Vishal
Hey vishal...
I totally agree with what michal said...
You can increase the response time in administration settings to avoid the timeout errors...
BPM is surely not a good option...
I know u want to make the scenario complicated but buddy thats a bad design )
Regards
Rahul Nawale
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
>>>>i was wondering, if i go in for an RFC to RFC call with uing BPM, does it makes sense?
in short -> doesn't make sense
Regards,
michal
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Vishal...
If you still insist on BPM then you can try designing the asyn-syn bridge i.e
Receive step (asyn)- receive ur sender rfc request
Transformation - map the request from rfc sender to request of rfc receiver
Send step (sync) - call rfc receiver and also capture the response from receiver
Transformation - map the response from rfc receiver to rfc sender (response)
Send step (asyn) - send the response back to rfc sender
Thats it.....
Regards
Rahul Nawale
rahul,
i did try the same but ther seems to b error on the receive step...
i presume, it had to b receive (sync) and then the send async and then the receive async and the closing the send sync bridge...
correct me if im wrong..
or else if i take the request of sender rfc in an interface to make it to b async then use the receive step?
but in tht case my data itself was not passin... a dump on the report sayin,
"call to messaging system failed: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException"...
regards,
Vishal
User | Count |
---|---|
95 | |
11 | |
11 | |
10 | |
9 | |
8 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.