cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Hi

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Friends,

When i try to generate the Transaction CodeCX34

I am getting the report upto June'07 = but entries passed in July'07 is not getting updated into it.

There are some entries passed in July'07 for the particular selections.

But in the list it is showing Zero.

Please Help me very Urgent.

Regards,

vivek

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

i think it takes the entries for the completed period... not for the running period

but i am not sure

hope this helps u

Message was edited by:

Aparna

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Vivekanandan

If you are sure that entries for july have gone into consolidation. Then check in the following way;

1. pl check in the ECMCT table with the consolidation doc no. if it exists there or not.

2. If you happen to know the account doc no. which has gone into consolidation then you can also cross check in fbo3 whether you are able to see the consolidation doc.

If the above 2 are satisfied then my hunch is that there must be some mistake in giving the parameters as a result of which it is not showing.

However if one of the 2 conditions fails .. it means that the entry has not gone into consolidation and it will have to be done manually.

Hope it helps you.

regards

Shubho

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

I heard it is only for the completed period not for running one.

Is it true.

Regards,

vivek

Former Member
0 Kudos

Well!

It is run from period to period, but it does not have any limitation (as far as i know) that it will show only for completed periods and not for running one.

This is however based on the assumption that your consolidation updation is realtime update and not a periodic one.

regards

Shubho

Former Member
0 Kudos

It's a realtime update.

This particular programme (For Transaction Code Cx34) is taking details from

Table ECMCT or ECMCA

Because my entry is lying in ECMCA but not in ECMCT

May be elimination problem.(I mean possibilities)

Regards,

vivek

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi!

Try running CXNR and CXNX which will give the FI docs not moved in to consolidation thru real time update.

Check the docs which have not moved into consolidation and if required/necessary move them manually.

regards

Shubho

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

I am not familiar with ECCS. So, please help me out to move manually the Document into Consolidation. Please brief me.

1. My ECCS Document is available in ECMCA table but not in ECMCT. (Real Time Udate)

2. When i generate Transaction Code CXNX & CXNR it is Lying their.

Please help me.

Regards,

vivek

s_mookherjee
Discoverer
0 Kudos

hi!

You should check the reconciliation ledger with the doc nos marked red (meaning which have not moved into consolidation).

You can use tcode cxnm for manually transfering those docs which have not moved thru realtime update. you can first check it thru the Test run mode and then carry out actual movement.

regards

Shubho

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

Thanks for your Reply.

But it says Entry already exist in ECCS.

Nature of Document is

Adjustment Entry:-

Transaction Code Used is F-05

Document Currency is Nil

Local Currency is Nill

Group Currency is Amount Filled

I thing transaction has no effect in FI only in Group Currency. I think some clinch is lying here.

Any idea from this

Expecting your reply

s_mookherjee
Discoverer
0 Kudos

Well! off hand i am unable to comment on the message that it is giving but.it may be an adjustment entry( am not sure)

Check the other docs which are marked as red and check their FI docs. Also check if the totals of the ledgers tally. If they do, it means even at line item levels there may be some docs which are red but in totality there may not be a problem..

regards

Shubho

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Friend,

I found the solution for my query. It was lying in the Currency Translation.

Case is What ever posting made in the Document Currency Getting transfered to Group currency?

Source Currency is Document Currency - I just checked the Customization of Additional Local Currency.

Regards,

vivek