on 07-09-2007 12:03 PM
Hi all,
We have an issue using subcontracting in SNP.
The demand from the customer is to have two subcontracting options available for a material/locations, and the planning to be split by a quota.
In ECC we have in the material master a prod. version (X001), using a dummy subcontracting work-center.
Also we have two info-records, both having the production version (X001) attached.
In APO 4.1 we have two external procurement relationships (as expected from two PIRs) and two PP/DS PPMs (for both subcontractors).
But both PP/DS PPMs have the same Plan name, they differ only by the source of supply. And as the mode generation combination is created by the PP/DS Plan name, it creates only one, therefore we get only one SNP PPM - using one (the older) of the subcontractors. If a planned order is created in the second one, the order has no source of supply.
What is wrong in our scenario? Is there a way to use two subcontractors at the same time (for the moment the only problem seems to be the missing SNP PPMs)
Does your vendor's supply more than 1 plant? If so, you should use location type subcontractor vs vendor.
You will need to modify the naming convention for SNP PPM's.
Most of the clients I have been at, modified the naming convention for both PP/DS and SNP PPM's to match a more simplified and logical naming convention.
Ken Snyder
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
7 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.