on 06-11-2007 2:29 AM
Hi ! I have seen this question in previous threads........and their responses. Many of them are responded with there wont exist a situation like asyn-sync bridge. And also they suggested to refer the blog
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
Inspite of all the above if you are in a fix to be choosen one out of these 3 which option is the better bet ??
a) send setp, synch receiver,asyn send,receiver step
b) Receiver steps,Async send,Asyn receive,Send step
c) receiver step,async send,Receiver step
thanks
kumar
Hi Kumar,
There is nothing like asyn-sync bridge..
What is present is synch-asynch bridge..
ie we have a synchronous sender and a asynchronous receiver.
Then we need to use synch-asynch bridge in BPM.
As mentioned by others...BPM should start with a Receive Step and end with a Send Step.
<i>Your B option is the perfect one...</i>
Cheers,
Sumit
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Sumit,
There is actually a concept called Asynch - Synch Bridge from SP 19. You can get a Asynch Request from a File, make a synchronous call to an RFC and then trigger this response back to a File.
More~ https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=3084724&messageID=3075228
Regards
Bhavesh
Hey
>>send setp, synch receiver,asyn send,receiver step
BPM will throw error here coz every BPM must start with atleast one receive step and end with a send step.
>>Receiver steps,Async send,Asyn receive,Send step
i doubt async send and async receive will work like this.
>>receiver step,async send,Receiver step
BPM must end with send step,not with receive step
thanx
ahmad
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.