Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

Accounting document is not created for movement type 108


Accounting document was created for 107.

But on reversing this using movement type 108, no accounting document was created.

This resulted in open items that could not be cleared.

Is this normal?

Thanks in advance,

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

3 Answers

  • Jul 04, 2017 at 05:34 AM


    Please check with your material type. Is it only qty update? no valuation change?

    However,while posting a question you need to specify what steps you are doing ,which t-code your are using,what is your configuration in OBYC settings etc.Then only anybody will be able to help in a better way.



    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Jul 18, 2017 at 08:04 PM

    How did you cancel? did you reverse the material document or did you create a new movement with movement type 108?

    when was the 107 posted and when the 108? different months? what has happened in the mean time? was the price changed in your material master? Was the price zero at the time of cancellation? Has there been an invoice between 107 and 108 movement creation?

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Hi Jurgen,

      Sorry for the late reply.

      Here is the entire history for this PO.

      The PO was anyway closed.

      However the GR/IR account appears as an open account in FBL1N for this particulary PO

      How can we clear this amount now?

      sc1.png (110.7 kB)
      sc2.png (78.3 kB)
      sc1.png (99.4 kB)
      capturesc3.png (2.9 kB)
      sc4.png (11.3 kB)
  • Oct 03, 2017 at 08:06 PM

    Looks like you need a historian with SAP knowledge.

    There was a time with a wrong value for the 108 movement, this was fixed with OSS note 1001434 - Incomplete valuation with BWART 108 (in the meantime already invalid) . So it would be worth to investigate if you were already in ECC600 when the postings were done and if this note existed at that time or was implemented later.

    Putting your movements in sequence then I see that 107 was first, followed by GR/IR clearance... before it came to 108 movement.

    However looking at the amount of your FBL1N document gives me the impression that it is not related to the 107 / 108 movement from 2012.

    The amount is equal to the 101 / 102 movements from 2013

    Is this FBL1N document at all created from the MM invoice that can be seen in the history of the PO - try to match the numbers - or is it a stand alone (and double) posting in FI?

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Since this was in 2012, I don't think we had ECC6.0 then. We might not be able to do anything now if it was related to that OSS note right? I guess will raise an incident to SAP to clear it.