on 05-04-2007 9:29 AM
Hi folks!
i am in troubles!
i have an rfc:
CALL FUNCTION 'ZFI_AUSGLEICHMELDUNG_KISS'
IN BACKGROUND TASK
DESTINATION 'XD7_SEND_AUSGL_KISS'
EXPORTING
i_augkiss = wk_augkiss.
the structure of wk_augikiss:
EZDAT DATUM DATS 8
AUGDT DATUM DATS 8
AUGBL AUGBL_KK CHAR 12
AUGRD AUGRD_KK CHAR 2
OPBEL OPBEL_KK CHAR 12
GPART GPART_KK CHAR 10
VTREF VTREF_KK CHAR 20
i fill the structure correctly. debug-session-view of wk_augkiss:
1 EZDAT D 8 20060712
2 AUGDT D 8 20060712
3 AUGBL C 12 000000012345
4 AUGRD C 2 02
5 OPBEL C 12 000000000123
6 GPART C 10 0000100013
7 VTREF C 20 00000000000000100013
but in the SXMB_MONI the payload of the inbound-rfc-messege is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <rfc:ZFI_AUSGLEICHMELDUNG_KISS xmlns:rfc="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">
- <I_AUGKISS>
<EZDAT>2006-07-12</EZDAT>
<AUGDT>0000-00-01</AUGDT>
<AUGBL>000000012300</AUGBL>
<AUGRD>00</AUGRD>
<OPBEL>000000100013</OPBEL>
<GPART />
<VTREF />
</I_AUGKISS>
</rfc:ZFI_AUSGLEICHMELDUNG_KISS>
there is a displacement of field-content. i tried to move the fields in the structure in to another place. nothing helped.
can anybody help me? the scenario should run today :-((
thank u for ur help!
Antonio,
After reading through the answers..i can only suggest this........
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d0019b1a-775f-2910-beb8-d81f27d0... RFC Troubleshooting Guide
Hope that helps, though in your case i also would open an OSS note as it seems you have done all that you can and might be a bug..though i am not sure if i have fully qualified that statement...!
Regards
Ravi Raman
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
May be you have to check if the system is unicode enabled. And if so then in SM59 you have to select the unicode radio button and also check the gateway host.
Regards,
Vish.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Antonio,
I am also working on RFC to File scenario.
While creating the RFC connection in SM59, We need to Give gateway host & gateway service.... So it should be R3 IP address and system no
or XI IP address and system no ?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Antonio,
did you find a solution / reason for your issue with the misplaced payload?
I have the same problem here and no idea.
Currently we are working with a self developed hot fix on sender side because our problem is in the field order which requires now placing '9' s into the digits of this field which are not transported because empty .
So order '000001234' is transported as '1234' and so all fields following are misplaced. With '999991234' it works!
But....
Any help is appreciated!
Thank you in advance!
Dirk
Hi,
Did you make some changes in the RFC strcuture after you imported into XI?
If yes, just make some dummy changes in the RFC adapetr and activate it again.
There can be issues in the RFC metadata.
Regards
Bhavesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.