Skip to Content
0

Destination HU could not be determined – Transaction LT01

Jun 15, 2017 at 03:02 PM

472

avatar image
Former Member

Experts,

When I try to create Transfer Order system throws following error message in Transaction LT01,

Destination HU could not be determined

Message no. L3 895

I am trying to move the stock from Interim Storage Type - 998 to Destination Storage type - PE and I notice this error.

I also aware that HU picking control indicator in source storage type configuration will be controlling the determination of the destination HU and in my case it was “Blank” (Adopt source HU with lower-level HUs into pick HU).

Please help me to fix this issue.

P.S: I tried to search thread on the same topic and unsuccessful.

Regards,

KUMAR

10 |10000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
* Please Login or Register to Answer, Follow or Comment.

8 Answers

Manish Kumar Jul 05, 2017 at 03:32 PM
1

Basic rule of HU is you should have a delivery to pack / unpack in your case you mentioned "Interim Storage Type - 998 to Destination Storage type - PE" stock in 998 comes direct posting as a result of movement type 561 so during LT01 system is trying to find the source hu and it fails

Can you please share your business case and process steps which you are following.

Show 2 Share
10 |10000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
Former Member

Hi Manish,

Thanks for your reply.

When I attempt to create Transfer Order system throws subjected error message in Transaction LT01

Following are the process steps,

1.Batch

2.IBD

3.HU

4.PGR

5.LT01 -> System throws in this step. Please help me to resolve this issue at earliest.

Regards,

Kumar.S

0

In my opinion the vaule in storage type should be "1" for HU control maintain the same and recreate the data from being and test, if you still face the same error then ask your development team to put a breakpoint before the line number 106 and let u know what value is missing

to find the root cause,

twofw.png (53.0 kB)
1
G Lakshmipathi
Jun 16, 2017 at 08:10 AM
0

You may have to apply the coding corrections as recommended in note 2076601

Show 6 Share
10 |10000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
Former Member

Hi Lakshmipathi,

First please apologize me for delayed reply.I missed to inform you that issue which I am getting in 4.6c hence I doubt note mentioned by you can be implemented in this case.

Please suggest me is there any master data (eg.pallateziation data) / configuration is missing in my case so that I can resolve it.

Regards,

Kumar.S

0
Former Member

Hi Lakshmipathi,

Please apologize for then delay in getting back to you.

Implemented following SAP notes as suggested by you but still error appears,

2002740

2076601

Kindly suggest me to proceed further to resolve this issue.

Cheers,

Kumar

0

how did you implement notes which are valid as of ECC5 in a 46c system?

0
Former Member

Hi Jurgen / Mishra,

Implemented the notes in ECC 6 and not in ERP 4.6c :-).

The Process flow which I mentioned it was working fine in ERP 4.6C version but not in ECC 6.0.

As mishra mentioned in my case HU is involved and therefore Storage Unit becomes Handling unit.

According to my analysis in ECC 6.0 system looks to input the Destination St unit field during TO creation where in case in ERP 4.6c this is not required.

Requesting your guidance to resolve this issue at earliest.

NOTE: same error appreared in ERP 4.6 c and got recitified and now issue is appearing in ECC 6.0.

Cheers,

Kumar

0

Hello Kumar,

Please check the below note which says that the error is caused due to program error. This may be due to implementation of 2 sap notes which you have implemented in your system Side effects of note

2002740 and 2076601

2426166 - Error with picking or removal of partial Handling unit or Storage unit quantity II.

Best regards

Shailesh Mishra

0
Former Member
shailesh mishra

Hi Mishra,

Implemented the Note 2426166 suggested by you but still error appears during creation of TO.

Please advice.

Cheers,

kumar

0
shailesh mishra Jul 14, 2017 at 12:39 PM
0

Hello Kumar,

I think as per our expert Manish has suggested to change the picking control value =1, should work.

I just checked in sap link and found the below configuration suggested by SAP.

You can also propose a source HU as the destination HU if the entire material quantity is picked by choosing Customizing for Logistics ®General® Handling Unit Management ® Basics ® Warehouse Management ® Define Storage Type. In activities Define Storage Type and Define Movement Types, enter 1 in the HU picking control field. In this case, the system does not support the reporting of differences.

Please replicate the scenario and confirm back to us

Best regards

Shailesh Mishra

Show 3 Share
10 |10000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
Former Member

Hi Mishra,

Thanks for your inputs.

HU picking control field configuration to be set / activated for Source st type right.

Please confirm?

Cheers,

Kumar

0

Hello,

Yes. Hu picking indicator =1

0
Former Member
shailesh mishra

Hi Mishra,

HU picking control - 1 was set already for Source st type.

Cheers,

Kumar

0
shailesh mishra Jul 18, 2017 at 06:15 AM
0

Hello Kumar,

I think you need to conduct first Putway(LT01) against the inbound delivery and then PGR. Since you have HU involved, and in inbound delivery, Storage Unit becomes Handling unit, so storage unit needs to be copied in Transfer order LT01 before PGR. There is a configuration in Handling unit. Please check your config settings and follow sequence as described whichever configuration is done in your system.

Logistics - General -> Handling Unit Management -> Basics -> Delivery -> Define Sequence of Transfer Order - Goods Receipt.

Handling unit allows the dual functionality of conducting PGR before Putway or after Putaway.

VL31N(IBD) -> LT01(TO) -> LT12(Confirm TO) -> VL32N (PGR).

VL31N(IBD) -> VL32N(PGR)-> LT01(TO) - > LT12(Confirm TO).

Best regards

Shailesh Mishra

Share
10 |10000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
avatar image
Former Member Aug 02, 2017 at 06:16 AM
0

Here is the screenshot you have asked for,


101.png (39.9 kB)
101.png (39.9 kB)
Share
10 |10000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
shailesh mishra Aug 01, 2017 at 10:15 AM
0

Plase check. I gave you a new note

Show 1 Share
10 |10000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
Former Member

Hi Mishra / Jurgen,

As I said in my earlier reply still error appears. Please let me know if you have any additional thoughts on the same, I can try to implement the same and check for a solution.

Cheers,

Kumar.S

0
shailesh mishra Aug 01, 2017 at 10:24 AM
0

HU picking control settings is at WM movement type level. Please share screen shot of 101 Nov type settings. You need to keep it blank if setting already done at storage type level

Show 1 Share
10 |10000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
Former Member

Please let me know the SPRO path details for Movement Type setting which you are refering.

0
shailesh mishra Aug 01, 2017 at 11:01 AM
0

LE-WM-Activities-Transfer-define movement type. {101}

Show 1 Share
10 |10000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
Former Member

Movement type - 101 screenshot provided.please check.

0