Skip to Content

GST Partner and Place of Supply is not coming in MIRO and other FI transactions

Hi,

All OSS notes are implemented from this summary note 2421394 - GST India: SAP ERP Solution Notes

Specially these OSS notes:

2376723 - GST IN: BAdI definition for screen enhancement in Enjoy transactions of FI and MM

2378678 - GST IN: BAdI implementation in Enjoy transactions of FI and MM

2417506 - GST India - Utilities

All customizations and functional configurations are done whatever explained in this OSS note 2421394 - GST India: SAP ERP Solution Notes and all in related notes.

Even after doing this, system is not showing the GST partner and Place of Supply in MIRO and other FI transactions.

I have seen the KBA 2456575 - GST IN: New GST fields not visible in MIRO/FB60 tcodes, All are in placed instead of the first option "The GST functionality should be made active for the company code", I am not able to understand this. Where to activate this ?

I am using EHP 617. Please suggest.

Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

5 Answers

  • Best Answer
    Jun 09, 2017 at 11:35 AM

    Got the solution.

    The problem was in OSS note 2303481 KSA PS :BAdI definition for screen enhancement in Enjoy transactions of FI.

    We never thought about that. Just reset this note and reimplement this note and the fields are now showing in MIRO and other FI transactions.

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Jun 07, 2017 at 05:45 PM

    the ordered list in the KBA 2456575 is a bit rubbish

    There is no 1 as separate activity, the whole KBA (point 2-6) is actually the instruction and the result is 1.

    2 and 3 are alternative actions depending on your system.

    4 just means you shall remove the * (star) in front to turn the statement from a comment into active code

    and in 5 you actually change the date to your personal start date of GST.

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • It was already done.

      What I think, This FM is not the problem. I have another system which is S4. The same is there for this FM. But the S4 is working fine. These fields are showing for S4. I have compared the settings of newly created BADI and the FM, didn't find any difference.

      init-test.png (32.7 kB)
    Further commenting has been locked.
  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Jun 07, 2017 at 07:40 PM

    Please implement this note and let me know:

    2419214 Changes to MIRO Invoice item level screen

    Thnks

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    Further commenting has been locked.
  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Jun 08, 2017 at 01:20 PM

    Hi Dibyendu,

    Did you have a look at 2456927 - GST India: Changes to manual steps provided in the attachments of SAP Note 2415115 ? I assume you have already maintained "X" in EX_GST_RELE and the sy_datum correctly in FM J_1IG_DATE_CHECK. If not, please check that also.

    Regards

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member

      Hi Dibyendu,

      Regarding your query " The GST functionality should be made active for the company code"...it can be checked through FM J_1IG_DATE_CHECK.

      Please refer to Note 2417506 in which it has been mentioned as below.

      The J_1IG_DATE_CHECK function module delivered with this SAP Note checks whether GST functionality is active for an Indian company code. If the functionality is active, the system executes GST specific logic for standard transactions (such as MIRO, FB60, VF01 etc.).

      Please execute the FM J_1IG_DATE_CHECK and check if the coding and the execution result are correct. For ref. please have a look at the below.
      j-1ig-date-check-1.jpg

      j-1ig-date-check.jpg

      Hope it helps.

      Regards

    Further commenting has been locked.
  • avatar image
    Former Member
    Jun 09, 2017 at 12:36 PM

    Hi All,

    We are still facing the same problem. Tried with all the above comments.

    I am using EHP 617. Please suggest.

    Thanks

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    Further commenting has been locked.