In 46C. we have SE16 transaction. It looks like In ECC5.0 or 6.0, SE16 is redesigned to SE16N transaction. But SE16N already exists in 46C itself.
Could you please suggest me whether in ECC6.0 we have to use SE16 or SE16N.
I know both exists in both 46C and ECC6.0 version.
But i dont know the diffrence why in advance version its suggessted to use SE16N.