Masked Cost elements

[Former Member]

Hello friends,

Am I correct in defining the masked cost elements in the following way?

5900++ -

---

> Labour costs

5+++++ -

---

> Secondary Costs

5904++ -

---

> Overheads

Am I not overlapping them, thus leading to a conflict? How do they work at all?

Can someone explain please?

Thank you very much!

Regards

SHIV

[Former Member]

Hi Shiv,

The number of Masked cost element is depend on how many of your transctions.

As I see your setting is overlap because the Secondary Costs.

If you mean Secondary Cost Element, I suggest to use 8.

For example.

00005900000 -

---

> Labour costs

00005009000 -

---

> Secondary Costs

00005904000 -

---

> Overheads

00008000000 -

---

> Secondary Cost Element

Regards,

Worached

Reward points if it is helpful.

[Former Member]

It appear that length of cost element is 6. In this case you will have to prefix with 0000.

Regards

Rakesh Pawaskar

[Former Member]

Hi Shiv,

The assignment is correct only. The 5+++++ will find other than 5900++ and 5904++.

Regards,

Velumani

[Former Member]

Thank you Arunachalam!

Can you explain more with an example please?

Regards

Shiv