cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Doubt on Aync-Sync Bridge without BPM

Former Member
0 Kudos

I created a scenario using Aync-Sync Bridge without BPM:

File(Asyn) => Rfc:BAPI_PO_CREATE1(Syn)

1 which mode of message interface should be used in IR for File(Asyn)?

Asyn or Syn?

2 if syn MSG interface should be used in the above question,how can i return BAPI_PO_CREATE1.response which includes PO number to the sender?

BTW:I had maintained the modules and their parameters(AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean and AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean)

in RFC CC.

Regards

Ming

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

bhavesh_kantilal
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

Take a look at this thread.

I have listed the steps for the same.

Let me know if you need further info,

Regards

Bhavesh

Former Member
0 Kudos

Yes, it works well.

thank you very much for your note.

Attention to your forum point

bhavesh_kantilal
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Glad to hear that it helped

regards

Bhavesh

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,Bhavesh Kantilal:

Have you done a note for "Synch - Asynch " scenario in SDN?

If not,i want to do one

bhavesh_kantilal
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Ming,

Please go ahead and do the same.

I actually tried a Synch - Asynch ( a HTTP - FILE ) and I was not very successful, so if you have faced success please do post the results here, so maybe I can give it a shot as well.

Regards

Bhavesh

Former Member
0 Kudos

Something wrong when the asyn receiver returns response to the syn sender!

I am looking at the XML message in SXI_MONITOR!

I will post a question later if it is not solved!

henrique_pinto
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

The problem about Sync-Async is how to correlate the two async messages as being part of the same scenario.

For JMS messages that's simple, since they natively have a correlationID. For other protocols, maybe you'll have to create this correlationID manually.

Regards,

Henrique.

Answers (3)

Answers (3)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

1) You have to use synchronous interface.

2) There will two message mappings(one request and one response) and one interface mapping between synchronous interface.

3) All the corresponding modules should ve added in File sender communication channel not in RFC CC.

Regards,

Sudheer

Message was edited by:

Sudheer

Former Member
0 Kudos

i am trying!

thanks,waiting for my response

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

Did you check this blog?

/people/sudheer.babu2/blog/2007/01/18/asyncsync-communication-using-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp-19

Regards,

Sudheer

bhavesh_kantilal
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Ming,

What is did when I tried the File - RFC- FILE without BPM was ,

1. No modules on the RFC receiver adapter.

2. All modules on the Sender File Adapter.

The message interface for file was a Synch Message Interface .

Regards

Bhavesh