Unable to convert the sender service XXXXXX to an ALE logical system

[Former Member]

I'm trying post IDOC R/3 , I'm getting the following Error

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>

- <!-- Call Adapter

-->

- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">

<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>

<SAP:Code area="<b>IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_INV_SND_SERV</b></SAP:Code>

<SAP:P1>XXXXXX</SAP:P1>

<SAP:P2 />

<SAP:P3 />

<SAP:P4 />

<SAP:AdditionalText />

<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />

<SAP:Stack><b>Unable to convert the sender service XXXXXXX to an ALE logical system</b></SAP:Stack>

<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>

</SAP:Error>

I followed the Michal Krawczyk Blog for troubleshooting.

Regarding OSS note its valid only for 640, Now I'm in 700.

any inputs ?

[MichalKrawczyk · Accepted solution]

Hi,

in your <b>receiver agreement</b> put a <b>business system</b> in the

sender service field

save and activate

Regards,

michal

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

My sender system is a business service, If I change the sender information in " Receiver Aggrement " , then I need to change the sender information in " Receiver Determination " right ?

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Michal,

Now I'm already My business system as sender of that particular IDOC(Outbound), to receive the same IDOC as inbound , Its not allowing me to, because the object is already existing.

You want me to create a new Business System in SLD , using 3rd party

Thanks

sagar

[MichalKrawczyk · Accepted solution]

Hi,

no, just in the receiver agreement (sender service in the HEADER MAPPING)

Regards,

michal

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Sagar,

I was facing similar problem and it was solved when I maintained the Partner Profile Name (from WE21) in Adapter Specific Attributes of Business system in Configuration Builder.

My scenario was Idoc to file but still worth a try...

Regards,

Rahul.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Got it,

Thanks

Sagar

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Thanks Michal