Skip to Content
author's profile photo Former Member
Former Member

IMportant::Section 80GG Deduction problem

Dear friends,

I am stuck with a problem in payroll which is given below.

System is not considering some conditions, i am illustratiing it below.

<b>when HRA is not paid to an employee by the company & rent is to be exempted from Income.</b>

conditions given by Income tax department.

1. 24,000 yearly


2 .25%of total income


3 rent paid in excess of 10 % of total income

Minimum of the above 3 condition is to be considered for exemption.

But when we update that section 80GG amount in Infotype 0585 (rent paid) the system is just deducting complete amount in IT0585 with out checking the above conditions.

Please guide on this issue.

2nd problem is

when Leave encashment is done PF is deducted as usual by 12 % but the same 12 % amount is getting cumulated for 12 months which affects the total taxable income.(technical wage type /434 .

i checked my wage type's all cumulation class,processing class etc..its seems same as SAP standard wage type for leave encashment.

<b>My previous Posted PRoblems are lying Unanswered in this site,please do help me dear friends.</b>.

Really i am in a bad situation.

Is availability of people who know Indian payroll iWELL is so less????

Thanks in Advance.

Add a comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

Related questions

1 Answer

  • author's profile photo Former Member
    Former Member
    Posted on Jan 09, 2007 at 01:22 PM

    Hello Abhilash,

    Problem 1: I dont think Payroll India handles this requirement. The value entered in IT 0585 is taken directly for exemption. It assumes it to be a computed value and the system does not check for the conditions mentioned by you. I think you have to handle this on your own. (maybe by a rule )

    Problem 2: I dont understand the problem clearly. Do you mean PF deduction (WT /3F6) is getting cumulated into /434? Ideally, the cumulated annual value of /3F6 is added to the Sec 80 C deductions.

    If you dont do leave encashment and have just only PF deduction, do you still have the same problem?

    A wagetype gets into regular income (WT /124) and eventually into /434 based on Processing Class 20 and Cumulation class 24 setting.

    Maybe you can verify futher with your wagetype. SAP standard wagetpe for leave encashment MLE0 is set for PC 20 (specification 8) and marked for Cum class 25. This means the payment gets into Irregular income (/125) and is never projected.



    Add a comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • Former Member Former Member

      Hello Abhilash,

      I think the solution is quite simple. Just remove (unmark) the cumulation class 11(EPF Basis) setting for your leave encashment wagetype.

      Please let me know if this solves your problem.



Before answering

You should only submit an answer when you are proposing a solution to the poster's problem. If you want the poster to clarify the question or provide more information, please leave a comment instead, requesting additional details. When answering, please include specifics, such as step-by-step instructions, context for the solution, and links to useful resources. Also, please make sure that you answer complies with our Rules of Engagement.
You must be Logged in to submit an answer.

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 1.0 MB each and 10.5 MB total.