Alternate Qualification

[Former Member]

I have set up alternate qualifications, however when I run PEPM (Profile Matchup) alternate qualifications are not taken into consideration.

I've also changed my PID system to PES - X. This shows the alternate qualification on the report but it doesn't interpret it as an alternate.

Any thoughts on how to get the report to read alternate qualifications?

Thanks,

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Problem still exists.

[heathershiels · Accepted solution]

Hi Christina,

How are you? I am having the exact same problem has you describe in this thread. Did you ever find a solution?

Heather Shiels

[Former Member]

Hello Christina,

In addition to information from the other posts here is what is missing from the Settings of Alternative Qualification:

Go to Tcode: PPUP - Settings: User Parameters

Mark the Field Alternative Qualification

Put your top level Org Unit in the structure access.

Make sure you have the Parameter PES - X in your profile.

This will ensure that the Alternative Qualification is taken into account.

I hope this helps.

Kind Regards

[Former Member]

Hello Sundeep,

thanks this solved my problem

Regards

Laurynas

[Former Member]

Christina,

I am using alternate qualifications in LSO. I am having a similar problem with Alternate "Q" equaling "Q". The system recognizes that the alternate exists and the person meeting the requirements, BUT will not clear the error to proceed to booking. Any suggestions?

[gangadharrao_tenneti]

Hi,

Alternative Qualification is nothing but the compatability of an Qualification.

Check the following:

1. Check the grouping (Q-Qualifications) grouped with the right (QK-Qualification Group).

2. Check the constraints for the profile amtchup

3. verify the duration you are checking and the qualification existing date.

Cheers,

TG

[Former Member]

thanks for your response

The qual 2 alternate quals are within the same QK and the validity period is 1900.01.01.

The profile match-up date is 2006.11.28

The profile match up shows the alternate qual but yet shows the qual as a deficit. However, when I select the editing option: 'deficits' only, it does not appear (which is what I expect). I would of thought in the profile match up report that since A = B that the difference would be zero. Perhaps the report (without editing options) is meant to be interpreted as an 'exact' vs A = B.

Thoughts?

[Former Member]

The report provides the correct outcome if 'deficits' is checked in the report parameter.