ESS: ECC 5 and Portal 7.0

28 Views

Hi!

Righ now for the Employee and Manager Self Services Scenario we have the following landscape installed:

- SAP ERP Central Component 5.0

SAP_BASIS 640 0013

SAP_HR 500 0020

EA-HR 500 0020

- SAP Enterprise Portal 7.00 (Netweaver 2004s) Stack 08

- ESS Business Package for ERP 2004 60.2 SP0 (deployed in the SAP Enterprise Portal 7.00)

- MSS Business Package for ERP 2004 60.1 SP1 (deployed in the SAP Enterprise Portal 7.00)

The installed XSS components are:

- SAPPCUI_GP 100 SP11 (deployed in the SAP Enterprise Portal 7.00)

- SAP_ESS 100 SP11 (deployed in the SAP Enterprise Portal 7.00)

- SAP_MSS 100 SP11 (deployed in the SAP Enterprise Portal 7.00)

In this landscape I have found some problems like the exception "com.sap.tc.webdynpro.services.exceptions.WDRuntimeException: Exit-Plug must no be triggered with an URL when running in portal. Use portal navigation instead to navigate to another application!" when we use the "Return to Overview Page" link after changing personal information.

For the investigation that I have made this XSS components should have been deployed in a WAS Java 6.40.

So the options now are:

- 1) install a java add-in for the ECC and deploy on it the XSS components

- 2) install a java stand-alone exclusively for this XSS components

- 3) install an Enterprise Portal 6.40 and deploy the Business Packages and XSS components on it

- 4) leave this as it is.

For the option 4) can you tell us what are the know restrictions for the use of the XSS components in 7.0 Java? Is the above error just the only problem for this landscape?

For option 2) The same XSS componentes on WAS Java can be used for both development and quality systems? Or there is a need to have distinct XSS components for each (development and quality) backend system?

Just another question for option 3), in this scenario the portal where the Business Packages will be installed can be used for development and quality systems? Or there is a need to have distinct Business Packages for each (development and quality) backend system?

Many thanks in advance!

Best regards,

Pedro