on 10-25-2006 4:52 PM
Hello,
archiving messages (BC_XMB)makes sence, but for archiving workitems (BPM) I can't see an business case.
Any ideas or comments.
Regards,
Geert
Hi,
After the Enron's problem in USA, in some countries, you need <u>to keep legally ALL steps</u> used by a software to transforma data during a sending of financial and accounting data. This is the <b>Sarbanes-Oxley law.</b>
http://www.sarbanes-oxley.com/
http://news.com.com/HiddenfraudriskinSarbanes-Oxley/2100-1002_3-5602776.html
And as inside a BPM, you transform, split, merge data in several steps (for instance by using three Interface Mapping), you need to keep/archive them! Not all your BPM (work item), but only ones which are under this law.
Here's the only one reason I see...
Regards.
Mickael
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Mickael,
in fact we have to archive all steps because of SOX requirements. But all transforming/mapping is done outside of the BPM (abstarct interfaces), which is covered by BC_XMB
Archiving. So I can't see an BPM step which as impact to the data which is not covered by the BC_XMB.
Regards Geert
User | Count |
---|---|
90 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.