on 03-29-2017 1:15 PM
Hello All
My Requirement is for 10 pay scale groups (each has one level)
Pascale group and Basic pay
Level1 – 01 Basic pay1000 = 3000 SAR
Level2-01 Basic Pay 1000 =4500 SAR
Up to
Level10 -01 Basic Pay 1000 = 10000 SAR
Indirect valuation of HRA and Spl.allowance is as below
HRA WT1001 is 60% of Basic Pay1000 (for all Pay scale groups)
Spl.Allowance 1002 is 30% of Basic Pay 1000 (For all Pays scale groups)
Regards
SK
Hello Uzair
Integration is as below
PCOMP BPIVT S Basic Pay: Set Indirect Valuation Period
PCOMP BPWM1 Default Value IT0008 - Wage Type Model
LGMST is fine
For basic pay, in T511 i have maintained TARIF B
in IT0008 Basic pay is correctly appearing from T510
The problem is, in IT0008 for Basic pay it is appearing as indirect valuation
Question: Is it correct to have Indirect valuation for basic pay in IT0008?
Reg
SK
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear SK,
Please check the table T77S0 from SM30 and check following setting.
PCOMP BPIVT S Basic Pay: Set Indirect Valuation Period
PCOMP BPWM1 Default Value IT0008 - Wage Type Model
now assuming that your indirect valuation model is Ok and your Feature LGMST is Ok.
Please check feature DFINF from PE03 tcode and check infotype 0008 is maintained there properly.
After making these setting check the results.
Regards,
Uzair
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello All
What is the Module variant to maintain in T511 to fetch the fixed value from Table T510?
Reg
SK
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello All
Any Update on this?
Please.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello All
Tried all Options, indirect valuation coming correct with SUMME B for WT HRA and Transportation.
But for Basic bay to get the same amount from T510, please suggest me some module variant (like INVAL-A for India).
This is the bottleneck as of now.
Reg
SK
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello SK ,
Please share the screenshot of IT8 and check any negative values are there in net payments.
Regards ,
SS.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello All
Requirement is WT1001 Should be Minimum 600
T511, field BTMIN just gives message, but we want the 600 to appear for WT 1001 (HRA) which is derived based on WT1000 (Basic)
Please suggest me some ideas
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello SK ,
It should TARIF-A for fixed amount and please check LGMST , wagetype model for WT 1000.
Warm regards ,
SS.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi SK,
1. The indirect evaluation model in T511 for international would be TARIF
2. In T539J, It will be as such
TARIF 1001 01 01.01.1900 31.12.9999 1000 60.00
TARIF 1002 02 01.01.1900 31.12.9999 1000 30.00
You can also try with ANSAL
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.