cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

LS26 has two different lines

former_member401793
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi All,

Please check screenshot below from LS26. I have created outbound TO against delivery for 18 PC.

Negative stock removal is allowed and material is fixed bin.

Can you explain why different line with negative quant is created eventhough stock was there in first line?

Thanks

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (4)

Answers (4)

JL23
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

I don't see any matching data to your initial screenshot, which had storage bin 04-114-1 and your second screenshot has 05-098-2 as storage bin. Also the batch number is different.

If you want to know why you have 2 lines in your initial screenshot then best you compare both records technically in transaction SE16N at table LQUA

former_member401793
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Jurgan,

Please refer below screen shot.

LS26:

LQUA: I am unable to find out reason why different quants are created at same time.

JL23
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

So far I cannot really see a root cause for having these records next to each other, can just do some wild guesses or ask further questions.

What I see and what confuses me is that all items have the very same delivery number

I also do not really understand why it is storage type 100 when you use deliveries, with deliveries I would expect 916 as storage type.

Can you share a screenshot from your delivery showing these items 150 to 230?

Can you also share a screenshot from document flow of one of these delivery items?

former_member401793
Participant
0 Kudos

Delivery lines:

Document flow for 2 items:

JL23
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

the most important information from the document flow is missing: the status column

former_member401793
Participant
0 Kudos

status is completed.

JL23
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

one last request: a screenshot from MB51 showing all movements for the material batch combination

former_member401793
Participant
0 Kudos

MB51 for material and batch

JL23
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Unfortunately an outsider can't know much from that, all movement types starting with a 9 are home made and not SAP standard.

I actually expected to see eventually some QM related movements which could have given some explanation to the situation. But how you use batches is very much different from our usage, a batch can not be reproduced again and again, this would all be different batches in my industry.

I certainly would check in various places now, but this goes far beyond what is possible with Q&A forum.

Does this case happen only to one material or only to this delivery or is this a kind of usual in your system?

If it is a single case then I try to clear the situation by doing a LT01 and moving the stock from the positive quant onto the negative quant , one after the other to make the zero and vanish.

But if this is not the only case in your system, then you may need to do an isolated test case to recreate this issue and then analyze it in regard to user exits and finally you may need to involve SAP Support to look at it.

MANIS
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Just addition to what Jurgen mentioned I see that your system is linked with SUBSYSTEM so you need to look that parameter also is there any mismatch in between the data you supply to subsystem and while receiving back are you receiving any different batch or the code perspective also are you using standard SAP approach to confirm this TO once you receive data from subsystem

MANIS
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

I am getting the below attach screen image when I open the txt. As requested earlier please share the SAP screen

former_member401793
Participant
0 Kudos

Date is huge. So uploading recent TO information. Please check and let me know if this is sufficient.

MANIS
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Suresh,

Purpose for asking the LT26 is to compare how much you received in storage type 100 and How much got dispatched out from storage type 100, either you can perform this activity at your end which will answer your query the reason for negative

or

Could you please filter the report output at Batch (batch number shared earlier where you have negative quantity 0000031615) level and check the size of output record and if possible please share

MANIS
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Can you please attach the LT26 result once again, I am unable to read the file (lt26.txt) which you have uploaded it is better if you can capture the screen and share rather then .txt file

former_member401793
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi,

Please check if it is visible now? I have attached again.

MANIS
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Please share the Transfer order detail for the bin using T-code LT26

former_member401793
Participant
0 Kudos

lt26.txt

Hi,

Please find attached LT26 list for new example with same bin below.