on 03-21-2017 8:22 AM
I don't see any matching data to your initial screenshot, which had storage bin 04-114-1 and your second screenshot has 05-098-2 as storage bin. Also the batch number is different.
If you want to know why you have 2 lines in your initial screenshot then best you compare both records technically in transaction SE16N at table LQUA
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
So far I cannot really see a root cause for having these records next to each other, can just do some wild guesses or ask further questions.
What I see and what confuses me is that all items have the very same delivery number
I also do not really understand why it is storage type 100 when you use deliveries, with deliveries I would expect 916 as storage type.
Can you share a screenshot from your delivery showing these items 150 to 230?
Can you also share a screenshot from document flow of one of these delivery items?
Unfortunately an outsider can't know much from that, all movement types starting with a 9 are home made and not SAP standard.
I actually expected to see eventually some QM related movements which could have given some explanation to the situation. But how you use batches is very much different from our usage, a batch can not be reproduced again and again, this would all be different batches in my industry.
I certainly would check in various places now, but this goes far beyond what is possible with Q&A forum.
Does this case happen only to one material or only to this delivery or is this a kind of usual in your system?
If it is a single case then I try to clear the situation by doing a LT01 and moving the stock from the positive quant onto the negative quant , one after the other to make the zero and vanish.
But if this is not the only case in your system, then you may need to do an isolated test case to recreate this issue and then analyze it in regard to user exits and finally you may need to involve SAP Support to look at it.
Just addition to what Jurgen mentioned I see that your system is linked with SUBSYSTEM so you need to look that parameter also is there any mismatch in between the data you supply to subsystem and while receiving back are you receiving any different batch or the code perspective also are you using standard SAP approach to confirm this TO once you receive data from subsystem
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Suresh,
Purpose for asking the LT26 is to compare how much you received in storage type 100 and How much got dispatched out from storage type 100, either you can perform this activity at your end which will answer your query the reason for negative
or
Could you please filter the report output at Batch (batch number shared earlier where you have negative quantity 0000031615) level and check the size of output record and if possible please share
Can you please attach the LT26 result once again, I am unable to read the file (lt26.txt) which you have uploaded it is better if you can capture the screen and share rather then .txt file
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Please share the Transfer order detail for the bin using T-code LT26
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
7 | |
3 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.