on 08-08-2006 8:17 AM
Which mapping technique in SAP XI is effecient and fast? Any real issues faced and suggestions with all the four mapping techniques?
I would appricate if you guys share your experiences with these mapping methods and the problems faced.
Thanks
hi,
>>>>Any real issues faced and suggestions with all the four mapping techniques?
I'd say there are 5
XSLT on java and XSLT on ABAP
it's still the same XSLT but with java XI has to
make a call to the java stack to get it with ABAP nothing
like this is needed
Regards,
michal
-
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Bhavesh,
Are there any limitation/bottlenecks to use graphical mapping for IDOCs or any big documents?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Anika,
At times context handling can become really really difficult and cumbersome using Graphical Mapping.
There is no hard and fast rule , but the choice depends on the developer and his comfort in each of the mapping techniques.
I for one jump at every opp to use java mapping , whereas my colleagues prefer Graphical Mapping. But, like I mentioned, if you can achieve something using Graphical Mapping, please use Graphical. Go for JAVA mapping only when it is an absolute must and unavoidable.
Regards,
Bhavesh
Hi,
As for problems faced. We used Java mapping in our of our projects and one major issue was the maintenance of the java mapping code. XI consultants are from various backgrounds and we found that JAVA mapping with SAX parser can be real difficult to maintain as well as make changes.
Graphical Mapping provides ease of use and I guess if there is something that can be done using Graphical Mapping itself, then you should choose Graphical Mapping as the choice of the mapping program.
Regards,
Bhavesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Graphical Mapping is the fasttest and most efficient.
ABAP and JAVA mapping are both equally good in tertms of perfromance.
XSLT mapping uses XSL transformations and is easy once again , but it can cause serious perfromance bottelnecks.
If the choice is between JAVA and ABAP, look into what functionality are you trying to achieve. If you are going to do multiple lookup s in R3 tabels , etc , ABAP mapping is good, if you wanna call some Java API's , use some standard java functionality, Java mapping can be used.
Also take a look at an ealrier Discusion,
Regards,
Bhavesh
Message was edited by: Bhavesh Kantilal
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
24 | |
11 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.