Skip to Content
avatar image
Former Member

ABAP XSLT Extensions or XSLT (XI imported archive)?

Hi all,

I would like to know which is having better performance in a scenario with a significant number of messages.

I know that ABAP XSLT Extensions is based in XSLT 1.0 and have some features of XSLT 2.0. So, for me it means some limitations and a disadvantage compared with all of XSLT 2.0 “standard” can offer.

But, my question is related with performance and I just want to know which is faster.

Thanks in advance,



Add comment
10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

  • Get RSS Feed

1 Answer

  • Best Answer
    May 30, 2006 at 08:28 AM

    Hi Ricardo,

    abap xslt has one great advantage

    abap stack does not have to communicate with

    java stack to perform the - so no RFC calls for mapping

    with many messages that might influence their flows

    but it wuold be best if you could just test it

    in YOUR environment (there are many test tools -

    like Loadrunner from Mercury) or you can write your own scripts

    and just test in your particular examle which one is better




    <a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

    Add comment
    10|10000 characters needed characters exceeded

    • no problem

      as for the testing Loadrunner

      can be used in 21 day (as far as I remember) trial

      so I'm sure you can create and test a few

      xslts in 21 days 😊 on both stacks

      testing interface performance is a good thing:)